Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Confucius Institutes: A Planetary Philosophical Gift

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-12-83-106

Abstract

The article discusses the philosophical component of the Chinese project for the harmonization of cultures promoted by modern Confucius Institutes. The author research the formation of the Confucian culture of Tao, the creation by Confucius (551–479 BC) of the first Chinese philosophical school as well as the dictionary of universals of Confucian culture. In Confucianism, on the basis of the archetype of the Tao culture, a model of “moderate prosperity” (xiaokang) is built. This model involves the implementation of five programs: the global foreign policy program (pacification of all four cardinal points around the Middle Country), the cultural program (the Middle Country is chosen as the meeting place for all peoples), the internal political capital-government program (the calming and integration of internal provinces around the Capital of the Middle Country), the moral and ethical program (peace of mind and peace of the people of the Middle Country), the program of state unity (ensuring the integrity of the Middle Country). The key role in the xiaokang project is played by the perfection of man, the achievement of a harmonious balance of physical and mental virtues, the formation of personality of junzi as the ideal person of future civilization. Although the concept of xiaokang appeared in separate medieval treatises of the epochs of Jin (265–420) and Song (960–1279) dynasties, the xiaokang returns to the forefront of Chinese history at the end of the 19th century during the movement for the modernization of the country. Xiaokang is interpreted by the reformers of China, in particular, Kang Youwei, as a necessary stage in building a society of “great unity” (datong). The “Architect of Chinese Reforms,” Deng Xiaoping, introduced the concept of “modestly prosperous family” (xiao kang zhi jia), the xiaokang of the “Four Chinese Modernizations.” The project of the formation of “community with shared future for mankind,” currently implemented by China, is based on a Confucian vision of the development of society and the world. In 1994, the International Confucian Association was created in China, and, since 2004, the deployment of a network of Confucius Institutes around the world began. The author concludes that Confucian culture has a supra-ethnic value because it opens the prospect of a new type of globalization, when cultures, preserving their originality but complementing each other by archetypes, form a single universal human paradigm.

About the Author

Anatoly E. Lukyanov
Institute of Far eastern Studies, russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation

Anatoly E. Lukyanov – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Head of Center for Study of Chinese Culture, Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy of Science; Russian Co-Director of Sichuan University and Institute of Far Eastern Studies’ Joint Center for Study of Chinese and Russian Cultures.

Moscow



References

1. Abramenko V.P., Lukyanov A.E., & Mayorov V.M. (2018) Confucianism and Taoism in Worldview of L.N. Tolstoy. Moscow: Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy of Science (in Russian).

2. Cheng A.H.Y. (2013) The Concept of “Datong” in Chinese Philosophy as an Expression of the Idea of the Common Good. The Common Good: Chinese and American Perspectives (pp. 85–102). Cham: Springer.

3. Dao de jing (1986). In: Zhu Zi Ji Cheng. Vol. 1. Shanghai (in Chinese).

4. Ding J. & Cheng H. (2017) China’s Proposition to Build a Community of Shared Future for Mankind and the Middle East Governance. Asian Journal of Middle eastern and Islamic Studies. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/25765949.2017.12023314

5. Li Ji (1983). In: Shisan Jing Zhu Shu. Vol.2. Beijing (in Chinese).

6. Lukyanov A.E. (2014) Shi Jing: The Archetype of Confucian Culture and Philosophy. Chelovek i kul’tura vostoka. 2014. No. 4, pp. 109–130.

7. Lukyanov A.E. (2015) Philosophical of Prototypes of “Chinese Dream.” rUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2015. No. 4, pp. 50–59 (in Russian).

8. Lukyanov A.E. (2016) Two Cosmogonies – Two Types of Civilizations: Confucian and Taoist. Chelovek i kul’tura vostoka. 2016. No. 5, pp. 39–45.

9. Lun Yu [Conversations and Judgments]. (1986). In: Zhu Zi Ji Cheng. Vol. 1. Shanghai (in Chinese).

10. Shi Jing [Canon of Poetry] (1985). In: Si Shu Wu Jing. Vol. 1. Beijing (in Chinese).

11. Suolang Z. & Yao W. (2018) Research on the Inheritance and Transcendence of Confucian Thoughts of “Grand Union” by the Concept of “A Community of Shared Future for Mankind.” Canadian Social Science. Vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 32–39. DOI: 10.3968/10382

12. Tay W.L. (2010) Kang Youwei, The Martin Luther of Confucianism and his Vision of Confucian Modernity and Nation. Secularization, religion and the State (pp. 97–109). Tokyo: UTCP.

13. Tian W. (2019) The Role of Confucius Classroom in Quality Teaching of Chinese Language in Australian Schools. China Media research. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 77–90.

14. Tomalin B. (2018) Taking Chinese to the World: Language, Culture and Identity in Confucius Institute Teachers (A Review). Training, Language and Culture. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 108–112. DOI: 10.29366/2018tlc.2.2.10

15. Wang D. (2018) A Study on the Trend of Community of Shared Future for Mankind in the Perspective of Marx’s Thoughts of Globalization. educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3753–3760. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2018.6.287

16. Xin L. (2019) So Similar, So Different, So Chinese: Analytical Comparisons ofthe Confucius Institute with its Western Counterparts. Asian Studies review. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 256–275. DOI:10.1080/10357823.2019.1584602

17. Yi jing (1985). In: Si Shu Wu Jing. Vol. 1. Beijing (in Chinese).

18. Yu T. & Jiayi W. (2018) Confucius Institutes. oxford Bibliographies. Chinese Studies. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199920082-0149

19. Zhao X. (2018) In Pursuit of a Community of Shared Future: China’s Global Activism in Perspective. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–37. DOI: 10.1142/S2377740018500082

20. Zhong yong (1985). In: Si Shu Wu Jing. Vol. 1. Beijing (in Chinese).


Review

For citations:


Lukyanov A.E. Confucius Institutes: A Planetary Philosophical Gift. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(12):83-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-12-83-106



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)