Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Universal Basic Income as a Way of Redistribution of Experience between Individuals and Groups

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-3-131-141

Abstract

This article reviews the possible role of the universal basic income in the transformation of experience in gender and age perspectives. The universal basic income has been particularly hotly debated in recent decades. Regardless of the position, the common tone of the debates is the imperative “we must experiment.” Such a close interest in the universal basic income derives from the fact that it threatens to change the “generic” for humans situation of finiteness of resources and the need to work. Thus, it is able to change the experience of what it means to be human. Since the universal basic income allows to separate labor from income, it is likely that its introduction will return value to the currently stigmatized or devalued types of labor, such as child care, elderly care or domestic work. It creates opportunities for experience redistribution in gender perspective: care and leaving (career break), affective connection, and sensitivity could become the business of both parents, not just mothers. Another experience redistribution is possible in age perspective. Along with automation of labor, population ageing is a universal process that will sooner or later affect all the countries. Alarmist narratives that present this process as a threat and a problem now prevail. They are largely based on outdated ideas about old age and what it means to be old. However, in fact, ageing is the maturation of the population as a whole. With a proper re-evaluation of the meaning and significance of old age, the introduction of the universal basic income could create material conditions for the transfer of experience from the elderly to the younger – for the first time since traditional societies.

About the Author

Alexander A. Pisarev
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Pisarev – Junior Research Fellow, Department of Social Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Moscow



References

1. Dean M. (2016) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE Publications (Russian translation: Moscow: Delo, 2016).

2. Dorling D. & Gietel-Basten S. (2018) Why Demography Matters. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

3. Forget E. (2017) Do We Still Need a Basic Income Guarantee in Canada? Ontario: Northern Policy Institute.

4. Foucault M. (2004) Naissance de la biopolitique: cours au colláege de France (1978–1979). Paris: Gallimard (Russian translation: Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2010).

5. Hum D. & Simpson W. (1991) Income Maintenance, Work Effort, and the Canadian Mincome Experiment. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.

6. Jenkins B. (2019) A Guaranteed Basic Income and the Aesthetics of Existence. Journal of Cultural Economy. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–35.

7. Lapowsky I. (2017, November 12) Free Money: The Surprising Effects of a Basic Income Supplied by Government. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/free-money-the-surprising-effects-of-a-basic-income-supplied-by-government/

8. Martinelli L. (2017, September) Assessing the Case for a Universal Basic Income in the UK. IPR Policy Brief.

9. van Parijs P. (1995) Real Freedom for All. What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

10. Widerquist K. (2005) A Failure to Communicate: What (If Anything) Can We Learn from the Negative Income Tax Experiments? The Journal of Socio-Economics. Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 49–81.


Review

For citations:


Pisarev A.A. Universal Basic Income as a Way of Redistribution of Experience between Individuals and Groups. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(3):131-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-3-131-141



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)