Contemporary Corrections to Understanding of Theories of Dialogues and their Implementation in ‘“Life World” (Experience of Sociology of Knowledge). Part I
Abstract
This article is devoted to the problems of the content and history of the “classical” theories of dialogue - from the point of view of the sociology of knowledge. The problems under consideration are as follows: the social conditions and structures that helped to the theories of dialogues to emerge, survive and develop (despite of all the obstacles in the forms of prohibitions and supervisions) - such as the existance and a dialogue of small informal groups of scientific communication which were a result of unevitable scientific specialisation.
About the Author
Nelly Motroshilova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Аверинцев С. Личность и талант ученого // Михаил Михайлович Бахтин / под ред. В.Л. Махлина. - М.: РОССПЭН, 2010.
2. Автономова Н.С. Открытая структура: Якобсон - Бахтин -Лотман - Гаспаров. - М., 2014.
3. Бахтин М.М. Беседы с В.Д. Дувакиным // Михаил Михайлович Бахтин.
4. Бочаров С.Г. Об одном разговоре и вокруг него // Михаил Михайлович Бахтин.
5. Каган Ю.М. Люди не нашего времени // Михаил Михайлович Бахтин.
6. Мотрошилова Н.В. Современные штампы и предрассудки в суждениях о философии и гуманитарной культуре советского периода // Философские науки. 2015. № 4. С. 64-80.
7. Эмерсон К. Бахтин, понятый. Право, но влево // Михаил Михайлович Бахтин.
8. Habermas J. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der burgerlichen Gesellschaft (Habilitationsschrift). - Neuwied; Berlin: Luchterhand, 1962.
9. Nikulin D. On Dialogue. - Lexington books, 2006.
10. Zappen J.P. The Rebirth of Dialogue. Bakhtin, Socrates and the Rhetorical Tradition. - Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.
Review
For citations:
Motroshilova N. Contemporary Corrections to Understanding of Theories of Dialogues and their Implementation in ‘“Life World” (Experience of Sociology of Knowledge). Part I. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2017;(2):35-49. (In Russ.)
Email this article 