Electronic Culture. Who is Against?

Electronic Culture covers almost all aspects of society, significantly alters consciousness, established skills, ways of thinking and ways of life, urgently requires their restructuring. E-culture is a necessary condition for the development of Russia, its worthy place in the world. This determines the need to concentrate efforts on the development of national science breakthrough technologies related to NBICS-convergence, capable of creating new productive forms of electronic culture as a means of enrichment and development of the Russian culture in general. This also emphasizes the utmost importance of socio-humanitarian examination of innovations in this field, the awareness they generate negative effects and counteract them. But at the same time it is equally important to create favorable social conditions for the further development of e-culture, to counteract the social groups and organizations that actively prevent it. This nihilistic attitude they are trying to justify by the political, economic, religious considerations. The article shows a complete failure and reactionary character of such arguments, including those which are based on the ideology of a special Russian way.

электронная культура, конвергентные технологии (НБИКС), электронные карты, электронные деньги, использование электронных чипов, социогуманитарная экспертиза, свобода личности, массовое сознание, массовые коммуникации, экономические интересы, теологические доводы против электронной культуры, национальная специфика, электронная культура, конвергентные технологии (НБИКС), электронные карты, электронные деньги, использование электронных чипов, социогуманитарная экспертиза, свобода личности, массовое сознание, массовые коммуникации, экономические интересы, теологические доводы против электронной культуры, национальная специфика, e-culture, converging technologies (NBICS), e-cards, e-money, using of electronic chips, social and humanitarian expertise, individual freedom, mass consciousness, mass communications, economic interests, the theological arguments against electronic culture, national identity