Methodological Aspects of the Problem of Personality in the Period of Greek Classics
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-7-129-149
Abstract
Among Russian and foreign researchers, there are opposite points of view regarding the existence or absence of personality in classical antiquity. Thus, this article is devoted to the study of methodological aspects of the problem of personality in the period of Greek classics. In particular, the articles examines the views of O. Spengler and A.F. Losev, who reject the existence of a full-fledged personality in classical antiquity. The author argues that neither the first thesis of A.F. Losev that in ancient Greece of the classical period “slave labor was the leading economic factor” nor his second thesis about “commodity production, which replaced the subsistence economy of the old clan community,” are valid. Therefore, a conclusion (that was made by A.F. Losev on the basis of these theses) about a specific understanding of man as a thing and a living body in antiquity becomes also invalid. The development of personality in classical antiquity was inextricably linked with the development of democracy, where a free-born member of polis (city-state) acted as a self-valuable person. This person had its own historical identity, formed by the culture and structure of society. In particular, the ancient Greeks were characterized by one of the main qualities of the personality – the awareness of their own freedom, the right to choose. At the same time, this self-awareness was limited and opposed both to other poleis and the unfree and dependent population within the polis itself – women, metics, and slaves. In answering positively to the question of the existence of personality in the period of the Greek classics, we should avoid the other extreme – identification between the experience of the spiritual life of the individual in the modern era and in the classical period.
About the Author
Vladimir V. StarovoytovRussian Federation
Vladimir V. Starovoytov – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Modern West Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow
References
1. Andreev V.N. (1983) K. Marx on the Purpose of Ancient Production and the Athenian Economy of the 5th and 4th Centuries BC. Journal of Ancient History. No. 4, pp. 3-31 (in Russian).
2. Clark M.T. (1992) An Inquiry into Personhood. The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3-28.
3. De Vogel C.J. (1963) The Concept of Personality in Greek and Christian Thought. In: Ryan J.K. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 20-60). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
4. Dobrokhotov A.L. (1980) Pre-Socratics’ Doctrine on Being. Moscow: Moscow University Press (in Russian).
5. Dovatur A.I. (1980) Slavery in Attica in the 6th and 5th Centuries BC. Lenigrad: Nauka (in Russian).
6. Gurevich A. (2009) The Individual and Society in the Medieval West. Saint Petersburg: Alexandria (in Russian).
7. Hadas M. (1960) Humanism: The Greek Ideal and Its Survival. New York: Harper.
8. Hegel G.W.F. (1975) Philosophy of Religion (Vol. 1). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).
9. Kessidis Th. Ch. (1972) From Myth to Logos. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
10. Kessidis Th. Ch. (2001) Was the ancient Greek person? In: Kessidis Th. Ch. On the Origins of Greek Thought (pp. 88-101). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia (in Russian).
11. Kilbourne B. (2017) Trauma, Shame, and Misery. Moscow: Institute of General Humanitarian Research (Russian translaion).
12. Kilborne B. (2021) Misunderstanding the Tragic: Envy, Shame, and Suffering. Moscow: Kanon + (Russian translation).
13. Koshelenko G.A. (1983) Introduction. Ancient Greek Polis. In: Golubtsova E.S. (Ed.) Ancient Greece: Problems of the Development of the Polis.Vol. 1: Formation and Development of the Polis (pp. 9-36). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
14. Kuzishchin V.I. (1983) Marx on the Ancient Economy. Journal of Ancient History. No. 2, pp. 3-39 (in Russian).
15. Losev A.F. (1930) Essays on Ancient Symbolism and Mythology (Vol. 1). Moscow (in Russian).
16. Losev A.F. (1959) Afterword. In: Thomson G.D. Studies in the History of Ancient Greek society. Vol. 2: The First Philosophers (pp. 332-351). Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura (in Russian).
17. Losev A.F. (1963) History of Ancient Aesthetics. Vol. 1: Early Classics. Moscow: Iskusstvo (in Russian).
18. Losev A.F. (1979) History of Ancient Aesthetics. Vol. 5: Early Hellenism. Moscow: Iskusstvo (in Russian).
19. Marx K. (1960) Capital. Volume I: The Process of Production of Capital. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (Vol. 23). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).
20. Marx K. (1962) Capital. Volume III: The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (Vol. 25, part 2). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).
21. Marx K. (1968) Fundamentals of a Critique of Political Economy (Manuscripts of 1857-1858). In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (Vol. 46, part 1). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).
22. Michell H. (1940) The Economics of Ancient Greece. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pohlenz M. (1966) Freedom in Greek Life and Thought. Dordrecht: Reidel.
24. Rosenthal M.M. (1960) On the Connection of Philosophical Theories with the Economic Basis (Critical Notes). Voprosy filosofii. 1960. No. 3, pp. 144-149.
25. Starovoitov V.V. (2011) Was the Ancient Greek a Person? Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. No. 2 (29), pp. 8-13.
26. Stolovich N.N. (1985) Man is the Measure of All Things. In: Piotrov-sky B.B. & Taho-Godi A.A. (Eds.) Ancient Classical Culture and Modern Science (pp. 13-16). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian)
27. Topuridze E.I. (1984) A Man in an Ancient Tragedy. Tbilisi: Metsniereba (in Russian).
28. Spengler O. (1923) The Decline of the West. Vol. 1: Gestalt and Reality. Moscow: L.D. Frenkel (Russian translation).
29. Yarkho V.N. (1958) Aeschylus. Moscow: Goslitizdat (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Starovoytov V.V. Methodological Aspects of the Problem of Personality in the Period of Greek Classics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(7):129-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-7-129-149