Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Philosophy in Belarus: Historical Specificity – Modern Trends – National Context

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-10-7-24

Abstract

The article considers the formation and development of philosophy in Belarus in the context of historical conditions and modern opportunities. Discussing the national context of the philosophical process, the author reveals the four aspects of the phenomenon of “national philosophy.” Firstly, there are national institutional and disciplinary structures, which are responsible for an organized scientific, methodological, research and educational activity, which at the level of the nation-state is formalized by certain institutions, system of professional education, norms of professional ethos, standards of behavior within the community and in the wider social environment. Secondly, in the light of philosophical culture, national philosophy is interpreted as a set of value and cognitive orientations passed down from generation to generation. Thirdly, national philosophy can be viewed in the aspect of the tradition of studying the philosophical thought of the nation in the context of its historical development. Fourthly, national philosophy appears in the aspect of the philosophical foundations of the national idea and national-cultural identity. The author examines the main stages of the development of the Belarusian philosophical culture, it is shown that the features of this culture were formed under the condition of a complex combination of the worldview and values of Latin civilization, Christianity, modern European science, rationalism of social projects of the Enlightenment, ideological and worldview attitudes of Western Russian culture, formalized Soviet philosophical disciplines. The article reviews the circle of theoretical, ideological, and practical problems that the modern philosophical process in Belarus faces, the author emphasizes the unfading value of philosophical knowledge as a source of heuristic means for finding effective local answers to global problems of cultural and civilizational development. The author argues that there are two conditions that make national philosophy possible: this is, first of all, a connection with the history of thought in the area of national genesis and also the expression of thought in a national language.

About the Author

Anatoly A. Lazarevich
Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Anatoly A. Lazarevich – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Director of Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.

Minsk 



References

1. Abdziralovich I. (1993) The Eternal Way. Minsk: Navuka i tekhnika (in Belarusian).

2. Chen L. (2009) Tradition and Modernity: A Humanist View (E. Ryden, Trans.). Leiden: Bril.

3. Hegel G.W.F. (1971) Works of Different Years: in 2 Vols. (Vol. 2; A.V. Gulyga, Ed.). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

4. Evarovsky V.B. (2017) History of Philosophical and Socio-Political Thought of Belarus: in 6 Vols. Vol. 4: Enlightenment. Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka (in Belarusian).

5. Marcuse H. (2003) Eros and Civilization. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

6. Marcuse H. (2011) Critical Theory of Society: Selected Works on Philosophy and Social Criticism. Moscow: AST; Astrel (Russian translation).

7. Podokshyn S.A. (2003) Belarusian Thought in the Context of History and Culture. Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka (in Belarusian).

8. Toffler A. (2002) The Third Wave. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).


Review

For citations:


Lazarevich A.A. Philosophy in Belarus: Historical Specificity – Modern Trends – National Context. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(10):7-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-10-7-24



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)