Hegel’s The Phenomenology of Spirit: Stylistic and Terminological Analysis
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-10-59-73
Abstract
In 2020 the international philosophical community celebrates the 250th anniversary of the birth of G.W.F. Hegel. This anniversary provides an excellent opportunity to once again reconsider to the iconic works of the great German philosopher, among them, special attention should be paid to The Phenomenology of the Spirit, which is universally considered as one of the most famous works of world philosophical literature. Being the first of Hegel’s major works and, at the same time, the first and only part of the early version of his system of absolute idealism, this book, largely due to the efforts of the French Neo-Hegelians, acquired the status of one of the most famous philosophical works. Meanwhile, The Phenomenology of the Spirit is rightfully considered one of the most complex philosophical texts, which does not cease to attract attention, including due to the intricacies of its style. Being called by K. Marx “the true point of origin and the secret of the Hegelian philosophy,” this work, among other numerous “secrets” and “mysteries,” undoubtedly hides the mystery associated with the terminological and stylistic features of Hegel’s writing. Noting the serious difficulties encountered in reading The Phenomenology of the Spirit, the author of the article shows that Hegel wrote it, developing a new philosophical language, creating a range of linguistic innovations, also using Germanized Latin and Greek terms. Along with Spinoza’s Latin terminology, he borrowed some concepts from his compatriots (Wolf, Kant, Fichte and others), deliberately altering their meaning. The article also shows that, being an extremely complex (both in stylistic-linguistic and structural aspects) philosophical work, Hegel’s The Phenomenology of the Spirit had a huge impact on the development of intellectual culture of the 20th century, and not only due to its conceptions. Its language itself greatly contributed to the formation of special philosophical terminology and anticipated a number of significant changes in the structure and composition of philosophical texts.
About the Author
Tatsiana G. RumyantsevaBelarus
Tatsiana G. Rumyantseva – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Belarusian State University.
Minsk
References
1. Bykova M.F. (2000) The Phenomenology of the Spirit as a Sketch of a New Conception of Subjectivity. In: Hegel G.W.F. The Phenomenology of Spirit (pp. 454−485). Mosow: Nauka (in Russian).
2. Deleuze J. & Guattari F. (1998) What Is Philosophy? Saint Petersburg: Aletheia (in Russian).
3. D’Hondt J. (2012) Hegel. Biography. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (Russian translation).
4. Haym R. (2006) Hegel and His Time. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).
5. Heidegger M. (2019) Hegel’s The Phenomenology of the Spirit. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (Russian translation).
6. Hegel G.W.F. (1992) The Phenomenology of Spirit. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).
7. Herzen A.I. (1947) My Past and Thoughts. Leningrad: Goslitizdat (in Russian).
8. Herzen A.I. (1954) Collected Works in 30 Vols. Vol. 2: Articles and Feuilletons. 1841–1846; Diary. 1842–1845. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Press (in Russian).
9. Kloc-Konkołowicz J. (2020) Hegel and Freedom/Hegel und Freiheit. Call for Papers. In: 33rd International Hegel Congress of the Hegel Society. Retrieved from https://hegel2020.uw.edu.pl/call-for-papers
10. Kojève A. (2003) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).
11. Marx K. (1974) The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (2nd ed.; Vol. 42). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).
12. Motroshilova N.V. (2010) Indtroduction. In: Motroshilova N.V. (Ed.) Hegel’s The Phenomenology of the Spirit in the Context of modern Hegel Studies. Moscow: Kanon + (in Russian).
13. Radlov E.L. (1913) Editorial. In: Hegel G.W.F. The Phenomenology of Spirit (pp. 3−4). Saint Petersburg: Brockhaus – Efron (in Russian).
14. Rorty R. (1996) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Moscow: Russian Phenomenological Society (Russian translation).
15. Sergeev K.A. & Slinin Y.A. (1992) Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit as a Science of the Experience of Consciousness. In: Hegel G.W.F. The Phenomenology of the Spirit (pp. V–XLVII). Saint Peterburg: Nauka (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Rumyantseva T.G. Hegel’s The Phenomenology of Spirit: Stylistic and Terminological Analysis. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(10):59-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-10-59-73