The Comte de Chambord’s Political Ideas

The article analyzes the political and ethical principles of the Comte de Chambord’s conception of moderate monarchism. The grandson of Charles X, the Comte de Chambord, Henri V (1820–1883), possessing high authority, throughout his life personified the hopes of the French legitimists for the restoration of the monarchy. In his writings, Chambord formulated a full-fledged political program aimed at opposing the ideas of the French Revolution. The political ideas of the Comte de Chambord were the most developed expression of the counter-revolutionary judgments of the third quarter of the 19^th century. To restore social stability, the Comte de Chambord proposed to establish a moderate Christian monarchy based on a revision of the system of government, the restoration of local freedoms, and the desire for social justice, significant improvement in working conditions. Chambord rejected Machiavellianism in politics, he understood power not as political domination, but as service with the aim of restoring harmony and justice. In his view, power in the state should be transferred to a strong sovereign, who becomes the arbiter of private interests and the guarantor of the common good. In a moderate monarchy, there should be universal suffrage, but limited to a three-tiered electoral structure that allows each member to be consulted on competent issues, trained in the performance of duties and to make decisions based on experience and merit. This political program faced opposition from liberal-conservative circles that sought to prevent the return to power of the king who was adherent to the of Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors with its well-known anti-modernist principles, and these circles demanded to acknowledge the democratic and humanistic “principles of 1789” as a condition for restoraution. However, the Comte de Chambord did not consider morally permissible to come to power through a compromise with ethical convictions.

1. Aurelius Augustine (2016) The City of God (Vol. 4, Books 19-22). Moscow: Direkt-Media (Russian translation).

2. Broglie A., duc de. (1938) Mémoires (Vol. 1). Paris: Calmann-Lévy (in French).

3. Chambord H., comte de. (1880) Etude politique: correspondance de 1841 à 1879. Geneve: Grosset et Trembley (in French).

4. Chambord H., comte de. (2009) Journal (1846–1883). Carnets inédits. Paris: F.-X. de Guibert (in French).

5. Chambord H., comte de. (2013) Lettres et écrits politiques du comte de Chambord. Clermont-Ferrand: Paléo (in French).

6. d’Heylli G. (Comp.) (1871) Les manifestes du comte de Chambord et la presse parisienne. Paris: Librairie des bibliophiles (in French).

7. Dubosc de Pesquidoux L. (1887) Le comte de Chambord d’après lui-même: étude politique et historique. Paris : V. Palmé (in French).

8. Maurain J. (1930) La politique ecclésiastique du Second Empire de 1852 à 1869. Paris: Félix Alcan (in French).

9. Novuvion G. de & Landrodie E. (1884) Le Comte de Chambord (1820–1883). Paris: Jouvet et Cie (in French).

10. Pichot-Bravard P. (2017) Progrès, Lumières et Révolution. Vu de Haut. Vol. 23, pp. 7–25 (in French).

11. Pichot-Bravard P. (2015) La réception du Syllabus en France. Divinitas. Rivista internazionale di ricerca e di critica teologica. Vol. 58, special issue, pp. 397–418 (in French)

12. Rials S. (1987) Révolution et Contre-Révolution au XIXe siècle. Paris:Albatros (in French).

13. Rouvillois F. (1996) L’invention du progrès. Paris: Kimé (in French).

14. Sauvé H. (1887) Questions religieuses et sociales de notre temps. Paris: Société générale de librairie catholique; Laval: Chailland (in French).

15. Tocqueville A. de. (1893) Souvenirs. Paris: Calmann-Lévy (in French).

16. Tocqueville A. de (1951) Œuvres, papiers et correspondances: Escrits et discours politiques (Vol. 3). Paris: Gallimard (in French).

17. Viguerie J. de. (1998) Les Deux Patries. Poitiers: DMM (in French).