Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Auguste Comte’s Reception of Nicolas de Condorcet’s Idea of the Progress of the Human Mind

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-9-90-114

Abstract

This article discusses the influence of the ideas of Nicolas de Condorcet on the formation of the thought of Auguste Comte, as well as compares the theories of progress of these French philosophers according to their key criteria: education, science, and law. At the end of the 19th century, a new direction in intellectual thought appeared in France was the theory of the progress of the human mind. The author of this theory was the philosopher, mathematician, and statesman Nicolas de Condorcet. Later, Condorcet’s ideas were reflected in the works of the positivism’s founder, Auguste Comte, who on their basis created his own system of civilization progress, which was called the Law of Three Stages of the intellectual evolution of mankind. Condorcet’s doctrine can be defined as a kind of integral “system of progress,” which is founded on the concept of perfectibility (the endless ambition of man and society to improvement). According to the philosopher, the real progress of the human mind has three keystones: a developed system of public free education, progressive law and constantly improving science, technology and art. Auguste Comte, inspired by the works of Condorcet, emphasizes that the predecessor, on the first hand, created an important scientific notion of the social progress of humanity as an ongoing historical process; and on the other hand, he designated the main object of research in social philosophy, which consists in the study of the fundamental sequence of various social conditions. However, an important difference between Comte’s and Condorcet’s ideas of progress is an industrial aspect. Comte’s progress of society is inconceivable without the progress of technology and economics. And even civilization the philosopher defines as the joint development of the human mind and human impact on nature. Thus, Comte’s progress includes the progress of the sciences, the beaux-arts, and industry. The author concludes that the French philosophers’ arguments on the significance of moral and intellectual perfectibility for progress are still relevant for the contemporary technocratic world.

About the Author

Olga A. Vinogradova
National Research University Higher School of Economics; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Vinogradova – Assistant Research Fellow, Poletayev Institute for Theoretical and Historical Studies in the Humanities; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Assistant, Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.

Moscow



References

1. Badinter E. & Badinter R. (1988) Condorcet (1743-1794): un intellectuel en politique. Paris: Fayard (Russian translation: Moscow: Ladomir, 2001).

2. Binoche B. (2018) Nommer l’histoire. Parcours philosophiques. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales (in French).

3. Bouton C. (2004) Le procès de l’histoire. Paris: J. Vrin (in French).

4. Comte A. (1880) Système de politique positive, ou traité de sociologie, Instituant la Religion de l’Humanité. Paris: Dunod, J.-B. Bailliere (in French).

5. Comte A. (1970a) Plan des travaux scientifiques nécessaires pour reorganizer la société. Paris: Les Éditions Aubier-Montaigne. Retrieved from http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Comte_auguste/plan_des_travaux/plan_des_travaux.pdf (in French).

6. Comte A. (1970b) Sur les travaux politiques de Condorcet. In: Comte A. Ecrits de jeunesse. 1816—1828. Paris: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes; Mouton (in French).

7. Comte A. (2016) Discourse on the Positive Spirit. Moscow: Librokom (Russian translation).

8. Comte A. (2017) Leçons sur la sociologie. Cours de philosophie positive. Leçons 47 à 51. Paris: GF-Flammarion (in French).

9. Condorcet N. de (1789) Déclaration des droits, London (in French).

10. Condorcet N. de (1793a) Exposition des principes et des motifs du plan de constitution dans le Plan de Constitution, presenté à la Convention Nationale les 15 et 16 Fevrier, l’an II de la République. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale (in French).

11. Condorcet N. de (1793b) Projet de Constitution dans le Plan de Constitution, presenté à la Convention Nationale les 15 et 16 Fevrier, l’an II de la République. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale (in French).

12. Condorcet N. de (1847) Idées sur le despotisme. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères (in French).

13. Condorcet N. de (1986) Discours de réception à l’Académie française. In: Condorcet N. de. Sur les élections et autres textes (pp. 181–201). Paris: Fayard (in French).

14. Condorcet N. de (1988) Fragment sur l’Atlantide. In: Condorcet N. de. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain (pp. 297–348). Paris: Flammarion (in French).

15. Condorcet N. de (1989a) Ecrits sur linstruction publique. Vol. 1: Cinq mémoires sur l’instruction publique. Paris: Edilig (in French).

16. Condorcet N. de (198b9) Ecrits sur linstruction publique. Vol. 2: Rapport et projet de décret sur l’organisation générale de l’instruction publique. Paris: Edilig (in French).

17. Condorcet N. de (2004) Tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain. Projets, Esquisse, Fragments et Notes (1772 − 1794) (J.-P. Schandeler & P. Crépel, Eds.). Paris: Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques (in French).

18. Condorcet N. de (2010) Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. Moscow: Librocom (Russian translation).

19. Coutel Ch. (1999) Condorcet. Instituer le citoyen. Paris: Édition Michalon (in French).

20. Coutel Ch. (1999) De Thomas More à Condorcet: une relève du discours utopique? Philosophiques. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 277–284 (in French).

21. Kintzler C. (2016) Condorcet, l’instruction publique et l’education physique. In: Colloque: Eps et reussite pour tous, 17 et 18 November 2016. Retrieved from http://www.snepfsu.net/ActesDuColloque/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Forum/C_Kintzler_condorcetSNEPNov16.pdf (in French).

22. Kintzler C. (1984) Condorcet. L’ instruction publique et la naissance du citoyen. Paris: Folio (in French).

23. Le Dévédec N. (2015) La société de l’amélioration : la perfectibilité humaine des Lumières au transhumanisme. Montreal: Liber (in French).

24. Petit A. (2016) Le système d’Auguste Comte. De la science à la religion par la philosophie. Paris: J. Vrin (in French).

25. Vinogradova O. & Ugleva A.V. (2019) The Birth of the Idea of Perfectibility: From the Enlightenment to Transhumanism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 113−131.

26. Yastrebtseva (Ugleva) A.V. (2015) Politics and Paideia. Republican Project of Public Education. Istoriya filosofii. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 25−45 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Vinogradova O.A. Auguste Comte’s Reception of Nicolas de Condorcet’s Idea of the Progress of the Human Mind. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(9):90-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-9-90-114



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)