The Concept of War in Political Realism

The article deals with the concept of war in modern political realism. Realism claims to have an original notion of war, which distinguishes it from empirical war studies and from other schools in international relations theory. Realism does not have a strict formal definition of war like empirical studies do, it focuses on understanding the causes and nature of war instead. The distinction between realism and other international relations theories like idealism, Marxism or constructivism consists in the realist notion of politics. Realism understands politics as an eternal struggle for power that underlies all social life, while war is the most intense manifestation of this struggle. Thus, the possibility of war cannot be eradicated. The article shows the normative aspects of such understanding of war. Realism, unlike pacifism or just war theory, is less enthusiastic about ethical or legal regulation of war; furthermore, it shows the dangers that may be caused by political moralism and “criminalization” of war. On the other hand, realism fails to provide a set of norms or principles that would surpass the just war principles. The realist principles of national interest and prudence are as vague, unclear and prone to misuse as classic just war principles are. Author draws a conclusion that to be able to create a valid set of principles of war, realism needs to further converge with international relations theory schools and “enlarge” the set of its base theoretical notions.

1. Alekseyev V. (2019) The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence. Russian International Affairs Council. Retrieved from https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/military-and-security/mif-yadernogo-sderzhivaniya/ (in Russian).

2. Allison G. (2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

3. Arbatov A. (2019) The Myth of Survival in Nuclear War. Russian International Affairs Council. Retrieved from https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/mif-vyzhivaniya-v-yadernoy-voyne/ (in Russian).

4. Aron R. (2000) Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Moscow: NOTA BENE, 2000 (Russian translation).

5. Behr H. & Heath A. (2009) Misreading in IR Theory and Ideology Critique: Morgenthau, Waltz and Neo-Realism. Review of International Studies. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 327–349.

6. Belozerov V.K. (2018) Image of Future in Political Ideologies and State Strategies. In: Rastorguyev V.N. & Nikandrov A.V. (Eds) The Choise of Long-term Strategy in the Context of Global Instability and Civilizational Heritage of Russia (pp. 106–123). Moscow: Institut Naslediya (in Russian).

7. Bordachev T. (2020) The Enduring Truth of Realism. Russia in Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/dolgaya-pravota-realizma (in Russian).

8. Brown C. (2007) “The Twilight of International?” Hans J. Morgenthau and Carl Schmitt on the End of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. In: Williams M. (Ed.) Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations (pp. 42–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Clausewitz C. (1998) On War. Moscow: Logos (Russian translation).

10. Coppieters B. & Fotion N. (Eds.) (2008) Moral Constraints on War: Principles and Cases. Lanham: Lexington Books.

11. Fenenko A. (2019) Is Nuclear Deterrence Effective? Russian International Affairs Council. Retrieved from https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/effektivno-li-yadernoe-sderzhivanie/ (in Russian).

12. Fukuyama F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

13. Gilpin R. (1987) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14. Hobson J.A. (1975) Imperialism: A Study. New York: Gordon Press.

15. Houweling H.W. & Siccama J.G. (1981) The Arms Race war Relationship: Why Serious Disputes Matter. Arms Control. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–97.

16. Khrustalev M.A. (2010) Methodology of System Research of World Politics. In: Bogaturov A.D. (Ed.) Modern World Politics: Applied Analysis (pp. 100–121). Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).

17. Kokoshin A.A. (2013) Mlitary Dimension of Political and Strategic Issues of Russian State Security and International Security. Moscow: HSE Publishing House (in Russian).

18. Krastev I. (2020) The First Seven Lessons of Global Coronavirus Crisis. Russia in Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/sem-urokov-koronakrizisa (in Russian).

19. Kumankov A.D. (2015) Humanism as Casus Belli: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Just War Theory. Russian Sociological Review. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 77–91.

20. Lebow R.N. (1987) Nuclear Crisis Management: A Dangerous Illusion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

21. Lebow R.N. (2008) A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22. Lenin V.I. (1969) Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. In: Lenin V.I. Complete Works (Vol. 27). Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

23. Mearsheimer J. (2003) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: Norton.

24. Morgenthau H.J. (1949) The Primacy of the National Interest. The American Scholar. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207–212.

25. Morgenthau H.J. (1950) The Mainsprings of American Foreign Policy: The National Interest vs. Moral Abstractions. American Political Science Review. Vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 833–854.

26. Morgenthau H.J. (1962) Love and Power. Commentary. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 247–251.

27. Morgenthau H.J. (1974) Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28. Morgenthau H.J. (1997) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

29. Morgenthau H.J. (2012) The Concept of the Political. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

30. Niebuhr R. (2013) Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

31. Orend B (2019) War and Political Theory. Medford, MA: Polity Press.

32. Schuett R. (2007) Freudian Roots of Political Realism: The Importance of Sigmund Freud to Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Power Politics. History of the Human Sciences. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 53–78.

33. Schmitt K. (2016) The Concept of the Political. Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).

34. Vasquez J.A. (2002) Realism and the Study of Peace and War. In: Brecher M. & Harvey P.F. (Eds.) Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies (pp. 52−71). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

35. Vasquez J.A. (2009) The War Puzzle Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

36. Waltz K.N. (2001) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

37. Waltz K.N. (2007) Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGrawHill.

38. Waltz K.N. (2012) Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 2–5.