Expert Assistance in Security Politics: Problems and Possibilities

The article examines the problem of correlation between the “knowledge society” and “knowledge practice,” based on analysis of the phenomenon of security expertise as a part of political expertise. In the article, we consider the relationship between politics and security and demonstrate under what circumstances security becomes politics. It is noted that at present the concept of security has become very multifaceted and includes various spheres, from military-political to informational and humanitarian. We defines security expertise, list its key parameters, origin, its institutionalization and practices. Special attention is paid to the characteristics of the main schools in the study of security expertise problems. Their general ideology and inherent problems are analyzed, including the correspondence of the quality of the expertise to recognized standards of scientific knowledge. We explain why security issues appeal to experts and result in numerous studies. We raise an issue of causes that may lead to possible deprofessionalization of security expertise. We identify a number of institutions with an expert status in the field of security and explain the global growth of analytical centers specializing in security expertise. A brief description of such analytical centers and their main features is given. We look into examples of practical impact of expertise on political decision-making, and possible mechanisms of expert support. It is concluded that expert analysis can exercise direct impact on political processes, and the experts become influential shadow participants. On the one hand, this may contribute to adopting more balanced decisions, but, on the other hand, it may result in deprofessionalization of experts who will try to adjust to the demands of politicians. Thus, in the sphere of security expertise, one of the results of the formation of a “knowledge society” is a decrease in the autonomy of the scientific sphere, which has a side effect in the form of deprofessionalization of knowledge. 

1. Ashkerov A. (2009) Expertocracy. Managing Knowledge: Production and Circulation of Information during Ultracapitalism. Moscow: Evropa (in Russian).

2. Angenendt S., Engler M. & Schneider J. (2013, November) European Refugee Policy. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2013C36_adt_engler_schneider.pdf

3. Archibald K. (1970, January) Three Views on the expert’s role in policymaking: systems analysis, incrementalism and the clinical approach. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2009/P4292.pdf

4. Belyaeva N.Yu. & Zaytsev D.G. (Eds.) (2007) Comparative Analysis of Russian and Foreign Think Tanks: Case Study. Moscow: High School of Economics Press (in Russian).

5. Bennet K. & Perez E. (2020) Nation’s Top Coronavirus Expert Dr. Anthony Fauci Forced to Beef up Security as Death Threats Increase. CNN Politics. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/politics/anthony-fauci-security-detail/index.html

6. Buzan B. (1991) People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era (2nd ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

7. Buzan B., Wæver O., & de Wilde J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

8. Conzen P. (2005) Fanatismus: Psychoanalyse eines unheimlichen Phänomens. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer (in German).

9. Easterly W. (2015) The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. New York: Basic Books.

10. Göl A. (2010) Editor’s Introduction: Views from the “Others” of the War on Terror. Critical Studies on Terrorism. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1−5.

11. Gruber H. & Ziegler A. (Eds.) (1996) Expertiseforschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

12. Guston D. (1999) Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87−112.

13. Haas E.B. (1990) When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

14. Habermas J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

15. Hansen L. (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.

16. Hrustalev M.A. (2015) International Situation Analysis and Political Expertise. Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).

17. Karaganov S.A. & Suslov D.V. (2020) The Protection of Peace, Earth, Freedom of Choice for All Countries. New Ideas for Russia’s Foreign Policy. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House (in Russian).

18. Kobrinskaya I.Ya. (1986) Think Tanks and the USA Foreign Policy. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya (in Russian).

19. Kokoshin A.A. (1981) USA: Behind the Global Politics’ Facade. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

20. Krems J. (1996) Expertise und Flexibilitat. In: Gruber H. & Ziegler A. (Eds). Expertiseforschung (pp. 80−91). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag (in German).

21. Lukin A.V. (2020, July 14) Theory of universal racism – new version of American cultural dominance. Russia in Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/teoriya-rasizma-novaya-versiya/

22. Mansharamani V. (2020) Think for Yourself: Restoring Common Sense in an Age of Experts and Artificial Intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

23. Maull H. (2020, March 30) Internationale Zusammenarbeit in der Corona-Krise: Chancen für Europa, Gefahren für die Welt. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/internationale-zusammenarbeit-in-der-corona-krise-chancen-fuer-europa-gefahren-fuer-die-welt/ (in German).

24. McGann J. (2015) Think tanks in security and international affairs. In: Villumsen Berling T. & Bueger C. (Eds.) Security Expertise Practice, Power, Responsibility. New York: Routledge.

25. Neal, Andrew W. (2019) Security as Politics. Beyond the State of Exception. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

26. Osborne T. (2015) In Defence of Security. In: Villumsen Berling T. & Bueger C. (Eds.) Security Expertise Practice, Power, Responsibility. New York: Routledge.

27. Slaughter A.M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

28. Soler L., Zwart S., Lynch M. & Israel-Jost V. (Eds.) (2014) Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. New York: Routledge.

29. Torrealba A.A. (2018) Antidiplomacy: Models, Forms, Methods, Examples and Risks (Russian translation).

30. Ullman R.H. (1983) Redefining Security. International Security. Vol. 8, no 1. pp. 129−153.

31. Voitolovski F.G. (2015, January-March) Creation of intellectual space of world politics. International Trends. Retrieved from http://intertrends.ru/old/eleventh/008.htm

32. Waver O. (2010) Towards a political sociology of security studies. Security Dialogue. Vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 649−658.