The Problem of the Relationship between Ontology and Theory of Knowledge in the Works of Samara Philosophers of the Late Soviet Period

The article discusses the issue of the relationship between ontology and theory of knowledge in the works of Samara philosophers of the late Soviet period. The purpose of the study is to identify the local specifics of Samara philosophical thought by revealing the system-forming significance of the problem of the conditional unity of being and thinking at the level of a distinctive separation between ontological premises and epistemological prospects of methodological reflection in scientific knowledge. The objectives of the article are (1) to establish the characteristic features of the views of Samara philosophers on the general methodological significance of the problem of the relationship between ontology and the theory of knowledge, (2) to demonstrate the methodological relevance of their theoretical principles in the context of the philosophy of science, (3) to substantiate the applicability of the latter for the activity approach to the social interpretation of theoretical results. In the course of the study, the author uses the method of distinctions, formed in onto-epistemology by M.A. Lifshitz, methods of functional analysis, diachronic reconstruction and rationing of the worldview legitimation of a particular subject theoretical entity. Thus, the article reveals the local specificity of the Samara philosophy of the era of developed socialism. The author analyzes the program for optimizing scientific knowledge based on the Borisov–Dukhanin methodology, tied to the materialistic solution of the “main question of philosophy” (i.e., the issue of the relationship of the being and consciousness). The article pays attention to the theory of the style of scientific thinking, proposed by V.T. Salosin, to the methodological foundations and reception of the socio-philosophical theory of M.S. Kvetnoy. The author examines the productivity of the Samara precedent of the interaction of worldview and methodological aspects in philosophy. The article concludes that the specificity of the Samara philosophers’ solution of the problem of the unity of being and thinking on the basis of the Marxist understanding of the the main question of philosophy lies in the fact that it is considered as a methodological problem of achieving logical consistency to express the balance between ontological premises and epistemological perspectives.

1. Aronchik I.L. (1974) Dialectics of Objective and Subjective in the Process of Artistic Personal Development. In: Dialectics of Objective and Subjective in the Process of Personal Development and Practical Activity. Interacademic Collection of Articles of the Philosophy Department and Scientific Communism (Issue 1, pp. 83–96). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev Planning Institute (in Russian).

2. Aronchik I.L. (1977) Methodological Meaning of the Term “Co-Creation” in the Study of the Artistic Perception Process. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (Issue 2, pp. 96–104). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

3. Aronchik I.L. (1980) Aesthetic Ideal as a Norm in the Real Art Functioning. In : Methodological Problems of Science and Culture. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 166–174). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

4. Aronchik I.L. & Nechayev A.V. (1989) Ethic Culture under the Circumstances of Perestroika. In: Aronchik I.L. & Borisov V.N. (Eds.) Culture and Personality under the Circumstances of Perestroika (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (pp. 126–132). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

5. Borisov V.N. (1976a) The Characteristic Features of Methodological Analysis Concerning Scientific Knowledge. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (pp. 4–20). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

6. Borisov V.N. (1976b) The Problems of Gnoseological and Methodological Analysis of the Logical Reasoning Forms. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (pp. 57–67). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

7. Borisov V.N. (1977) The Analysis of Categorical Structure Regarding the Knowledge Evolution Process. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (pp. 4–18). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

8. Borisov V.N. (1980) Interpreting Knowledge within the System of Epistemological Categories In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 6–48). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

9. Borisov V.N. (1983) Reflexivity in Science: Gnoseological Essence, Forms and Functions. In: Reflexivity Problem in Scientific Cognition. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 7–13). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

10. Borisov V.N. (1986) The Correlation of the Scientific Research Structure and the Way of Presentation. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) Problems of Dialectics of Scientific Cognition (pp. 143–156). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

11. Borisov V.N. (1988) The Categorical Knowledge: Gnoseological Essence, Forms and Modes of Existence. In: Categorical Basis of Scientific Knowledge. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 5–29). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

12. Borisov V.N. (1996) Aristotelian Philosophy. Samara: Samara Humanitarian Academy Publishing House (in Russian).

13. Borisov V.N. & Dukhanin V.N. (1974a) The Correlation Problem of Subjective Knowledge Forms with Objective Actual Reality. In: Dialectics of Objective and Subjective in the Cognition Process and Practical Activity. Interacademic Collection of Articles of the Philosophy Department and Scientific Communism (Issue 1, pp. 58–68). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev Planning Institute (in Russian).

14. Borisov V.N. & Dukhanin V.N. (1974b) Scientific Knowledge Formation Within the Frame of Social-Economic Research (The Problem of Scientific Cognition Methodology). Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House (in Russian).

15. Borisov V.N. & Khazova L.V. (1977) Some Aspects Regarding Functioning and Development of the Notions Withing the Scope of Theoretical Knowledge Systems. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (Issue 2, pp. 29–35). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

16. Borisov V.N. & Surkova N.V. (1986) Philosophy and Reflexivity. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) Problems of Dialectics Scientific Cognition (pp. 5–15). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

17. Dubrovskiy D.I. (1983) The Problem of the Ideal. Mosсow: Mysl’ (in Russian).

18. Dukhanin V.N. (1976) Knowledge Objects within the Frame of Sociological Theory Structure. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (pp. 42–67). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

19. Dukhanin V.N. (1977) Abstract Objects and Mechanisms of Scientific Knowledge Creation. In: Methodological Problems of Science and Culture (Interuniversity Collection of Articles) (Issue 2, pp. 18–29). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

20. Dukhanin V.N. (1983a) Reflexivity in Social Cognition. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) Reflexivity Problems in Scientific Cognition. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 141–147). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

21. Dukhanin V.N. (1983b) Formation of Social Knowledge. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House (in Russian).

22. Dukhanin V.N. (1986) The Ideal and the Problem of Correlation of the Empiric Knowledge and the Reality. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) Problems of Dialectics Scientific Cognition (pp. 41–51). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

23. Dukhanin V.N. (1988) Categorical Structure of Social Cognition. In: Categorical Basis of Scientific Knowledge. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 92–99). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

24. Frolov I.T. (1983) Perspective of a Human Being. Experience of the Complex Problem Statement, Discussion, Generalization. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

25. Frolov I.T. (1989) On Human Being and Humanism. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

26. Ilyenkov E.V. (1997) Dialectics of the Abstractiveness and the Certainty in Scientific-Theoretical Reasoning. Moscow: Rosspen (in Russian).

27. Ilyenkov E.V. (2010) Dialectical Logic: Essays on History and Theory (3rd ed.). Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

28. Kopnin P.V. (1973) Dialectics as Logics Withing the Cognition Theory. The Experience of Logical-Gnoseological Research. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

29. Kopnin P.V. (1974) Gnoseological and Logical Science Basics. Moscow: Mysl′ (in Russian).

30. Kovshov E.M. (2020) Social Reflexivity (Structure, Forms and Functions). Samara: Samara State Technical University (in Russian).

31. Kvetnoy M.S. (1974a) The Phenomenon of a Goal as the Unity of the Abstractiveness and the Certainty in Human Activity Regulation. In: Dialectics of Objective and Subjective in the Cognition Process and Practical Activity. Interacademic Collection of Articles of the Philosophy Department and Scientific Communism (Issue 1, pp. 26–39). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev Planning Institute (in Russian).

32. Kvetnoy M.S. (1974b) Human Activity: Essence, Structure and Types (Sociological Aspect). Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House (in Russian).

33. Kvetnoy M.S. (1989) The Problem of the Complete Human Formation. In: Aronchik I.L. & Borisov V.N. (Eds.) Culture and Personality under the Circumstances of Perestroika. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 3–9). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

34. Lifshitz M.A. (2004) What is Classics? Ontognoseologics. The Meaning of the world as “The Pure Medium”. Moscow: Iskusstvo – XXI vek (in Russian).

35. Lifshitz M.A. (2010) Varia. Moscow: Grundrisse (in Russian).

36. Salosin V.T. (1972) Dialectics of Natural Sciences’ Mutual Integration. Volgograd: Nizhne-Volzhskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo (in Russian).

37. Salosin V.T. (1983) Reflexivity and Integration of Sciences. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) The Problem of Reflexivity in Scientific Cognition. Interacademic Collection of Articles (pp. 69–73). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev University (in Russian).

38. Salosin V.T. (1988) Categorical Basics of Scientific Knowledge Integration. In: Categorical Basis of Scientific Knowledge. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 39–46). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev University (in Russian).

39. Salosin V.T. (2006) Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Samara: Samara Municipal Nayanova University (in Russian).

40. Shestakov A.A. (1994) Ontologism as the Strategy of Consciousness Interpretation (Phenomenology and Philosophical Hermeneutics’ Experience). In: Portnov A.N. (Ed.) Philosophy of Consciousness of the Twentieth Century: Problems and Solutions. Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Articles (pp. 32–41). Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University (in Russian).

41. Taller R.I. (1989a) Some Methodological Problems of the Law Culture. In: Aronchik I.L. & Borisov V.N. (Eds.) Culture and Personality under the Circumstances of Perestroika. Interuniversity Collection of Articles (pp. 119–126). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).

42. Taller R.I. (1989b) Philosophy as Logics and Law Cognition Methodology. Kuibyshev: Saratov University Publishing House, Kuibyshev Branch (in Russian).

43. Taller R.I. (1999) Notes Regarding the System Character of Philosophy I. Kant on Account of the Philosophy Origin. In: Taller R.I., Sysoev D.Yu., & Zanin S.V. (Eds.) Сonversations with Kant – 99. Collection of Scientific Articles (pp. 62–71). Samara: SamVen, (in Russian)

44. Yurovitskiy O.G. (1986) Analyzing the Goal-Setting Structure. In: Borisov V.N. (Ed.) Problems of Dialectics of Scientific Cognition (pp. 23–33). Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State University (in Russian).