Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Education as Thinking, or The Role of Philosophy in the Educational System

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-24-50

Abstract

The article examines education from the perspective of its goals and functions. The development of thinking skills is considered as both the goal and function of education, and the process of thinking as a means of education. Education is broadly understood as the creation of an image, and narrowly as the complex of social institutions that carry out educational activity. As a mechanism of socialization, education is one of the most important historically formed tools for the training and development of thinking ability, which is the main instrument of the evolutionary strategy of homo sapiens. The article discusses the ontological status of thought as an attributive property of homo sapiens that defines human being. Thinking is a psychic reality rooted in biological processes, the fundamental basis of all cognitive and human activity-based processes. The author conducts a philosophical analysis of the concepts of thinking, good thinking, qualitative thought, and education. Philosophizing is considered as a special type of thinking, and the article researches its instrumental function, the potential ability to produce sanity, prudence, an analytical approach to any situation, and the ability to make independent decisions. Common to all philosophizing subjects will be that they will act as “demiurges” of their world, which they will be able to fill with their own meanings and values. Philosophical thinking is free thinking, which has a playful character, and therefore it can be defined as a game of meanings. The article describes existing approaches to the development of the philosophical education of children. The author draws attention to the advantage of the Russian system of higher education in connection with the compulsory teaching of philosophy, and argues to develop philosophical education for schoolchildren. The article concludes that the philosophical component of education at all levels, from elementary school to university, is an effective way to form high-quality thinking among students.

About the Author

Larisa T. Retyunskikh
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Larisa T. Retyunskikh – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Department
of the Philosophy of Natural Sciences Faculties, Faculty of Philosophy,
Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Moscow



References

1. Altman M.C. (Ed.) (2017) The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

2. Dewey J. (2000) Democracy and Education. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press (Russian translation).

3. Dudina M.N. (1995) Philosophy in the Classroom. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University (in Russian).

4. Epicurus. (1969) Letter to Menoeceus. In: Sokolov V.V. (Ed.) Anthology of World Philosophical Thought in 4 Vols. (Vol. 1, part 1, pp. 354–358). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

5. Geraschenko I.G. & Geraschenko N.V. (2022) Philosophy of Education. Moscow: Ruscience (in Russian).

6. Gregory M.R. & Laverty M.J. (Ed.) (2022) Gareth B. Matthews, The Child’s Philosopher. New York: Routledge.

7. Grekhnev V.S. (2017) Philosophy of Education. Moscow: Yurayt (in Russian).

8. Hegel G.W.F. (1970) Science of Logic (Vol. 1). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

9. James W. (2011) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).

10. Kant I. (1964) Critique of Pure Reason. In: Kant I. Collected Works in 6 Vols. (Vol. 3). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

11. Kennedy D. (2006) The Well of Being. Childhood, Subjectivity, and Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Pres.

12. Kohan W. (2015) Childhood, Education and Philosophy: New Ideas for an Old Relationship. New York: Routledge.

13. Lipman M. (1995) Good Thinking. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 37–41.

14. Lipman M. (2003) Thinking in Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15. Louden R.B. (2017) Becoming Human: Kant’s Philosophy of Education and Human Nature. In: Altman M.C. (Ed.) The Palgrave Kant Handbook (pp. 705–727). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

16. Paul R.W. (1990) Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.

17. Piaget J. (2003) The Psychology of Intelligence. Saint Petersburg: Piter (Russian translation).

18. Popper K. (2000) Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Sadovskiy V.N. (Ed.) Evolutionary Epistemology and Logic of Social Sciences: Karl Popper and His Critics (pp. 57–74). Moscow: Editorial URSS (Russian translation).

19. Retyunskikh L.T. (2003) “School of Socrates”: Philosophical Games Ten Years Later. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow Psychosocial Institute; Voronezh: MODEK (in Russian).

20. Retyunskikh L.T. (2018) Journey in the Labyrinths of Wisdom. Philosophy for Primary School Students. Moscow: Vita-Press (in Russian).

21. Roth K. & Formosa P. (2019) Kant on Education and Evil – Perfecting Human Beings with an Innate Propensity to Radical Evil. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Vol. 51, no. 13, pp. 1304–1307.

22. Smirnov I.P. & Khomich A.L. (2020) On the Pedagogical Legacy of I. Kant: Scientific Dialogue. Kazan Pedagogical Journal. No. 1, pp. 18–29 (in Russian).

23. Vygotsky L.S. (1982) Thought and Language. In: Vygotsky L.S. Collected Works in 6 Vols. (Vol. 2, pp. 5–351). Moscow: Pedagogika (in Russian).

24. Yulina N.S. (2005) Philosophy for Children. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Retyunskikh L.T. Education as Thinking, or The Role of Philosophy in the Educational System. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2023;66(1):24-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-24-50



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)