Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Civilizational Self-Identification as a Response to the Neoliberal Crisis

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-77-97

Abstract

The article discusses issues related to overcoming the crisis situation of non-Western countries, including Russia, caused by the uncritical acceptance of the neoliberal universalistic paradigm of development at the turn of the century. The intellectual response to the crisis led the initiative of civilizational self-identification of these countries based on the formation of a new principle of supranational organization in the form of a “civilizationstate,” which is perceived by Western analysts as a fundamental global challenge of modernity requiring a comprehensive theoretical understanding. As of the present time, in their opinion, China, India, and Russia can be classified as “civilization states.” It is asserted that the civilizational turn emerged as a result of the opposition of the “core” states (in the terminology of S. Huntington) of unipolar hegemony, which initiates the conflict potential for the development of the world community, threatening the integrity of the existing Euro-American order. Russian researchers, for their part, note the negative consequences of the universalistic aspiration to spread the model of the “nation-state” to the whole world, which occurs within the logic of limited sovereignty and is destructive for Russia. Actions to overcome the internal crisis discussed in the article include a transition to a national-civilizational form of identity and the implementation of the idea of a “Russian-centric world.” This corresponds to the global trend of forming macro-regional “civilization-worlds” based on common cultural and social values developed during a long period of coexistence. The article demonstrates that the revival of “civilizationalism” is taking place against the background of the worldwide trend of the split of modernity. There is an actualization of the project of the “East-Westphalian system,” called the “Eastphalian” world order, which rejects European universalism and opens the way to a new multipolar world order.

About the Author

Valeria I. Spiridonova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation

Valeria I. Spiridonova – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Chief Research Fellow, Department of the Philosophical Problems of Politics, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Moscow



References

1. Arnason J. (2021) Civilizational Patterns and Historical Processes. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie (Russian translation).

2. Bagdasaryan V.E. (2009) Russia as a State-Civilization. In: Yakunin V.I. (Ed.) Geoeconomic Formula of World Order: Russia in the New Universe. Materials of the Ongoing Seminar (Vol. 1, pp. 102–106). Moscow: Nauchnyy ekspert (in Russian).

3. Bagdasaryan V.E. (2014) Nation-Building or Empire-Building: A Fork in Approaches. Problem Analysis and Public Administration Projection. No. 1, pp. 47–50 (in Russian).

4. Braudel F. (1992) The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century. Vol. 3: The Time of History. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

5. Coker C. (2000) Twilight of the West. Inostrannaya literatura. No. 5. Retrieved from https://magazines.gorky.media/inostran/2000/5/sumerki-zapada.html (Russian translation).

6. Eisenstadt S. (2010) Breakdowns of Modernization. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. No. 6. Retrieved from https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2010/6/sryvy-modernizaczii.html

7. Fidler D. (2010) Introduction: Eastphalia Emerging? Asia, International Law, and Global Governance. Indiana Journal of Global Governance. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–12.

8. Fogel J.A. (2009) Articulating the Sinosphere: Sino-Japanese Relations in Space and Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9. Ginsburg T. (2010) Eastphalia as a Return to Westphalia. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 27–45.

10. Huntington S. (2006) The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

11. Jacques M. (2012) When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. London: Penguin Books.

12. Jain A. (2021) Comparing Civilization-State Models. China, Russia, India. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 93–125.

13. Lubskiy A.V. (2015) State-Civilization and National-Civilizational Identity in Russia. Gumanitariy yuga Rossii. No. 2, pp. 30–45 (in Russian).

14. Mchedlova M.M. (2020) The Concept of “Civilization”: History and Methodology. In: Russian (Slavic) Civilization: History, Realities, Prospects. Analytical and Forecasting Aspect (pp. 5-13). Moscow: International Academy of Methodology of Public Administration (in Russian).

15. Mezhuev V.M. (2016) Civilization or Civilizations? (On the Disputes about the Concept of Civilization). Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. No. 2, pp. 40–52 (in Russian).

16. Mezhuev B.V. (2019) “Civilizational Realism” as a Chance for the Return of Theory to Real Politics. Social and Humanitarian Sciences. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series: Philosophy. Abstract Journal. No. 4, pp. 6–26 (in Russian).

17. Pabst A. (2019, May 8) China, Russia and the Return of the Civilisational State. The New Statesman. Retrieved from https://www.newstatesman.com/2019/05/china-russia-and-return-civilisational-state

18. Parshin P.B. (2009) State and Civilization in Modern International Relations. Moscow: MGIMO (in Russian).

19. Prabhu J. A. (2014, December 8) Why the Idea of India as a ‘Civilisational’ State Will Simply Not Fly. Firstpost. Retrieved from https://www.firstpost.com/india/idea-india-civilisational-state-will-simply-fly-1839641.html

20. Rastorguev V.N. (Ed.) (2016) Russia as a State-Civilization: Higher Goals and Development Alternatives. Moscow: Institute naslediya (in Russian).

21. Remizov M.V. (2005) The Project of State-Civilization. In: Constitution of Russia. Project of the Institute of National Strategy (pp. 55–70). Moscow: Institut natsional’noy strategii (in Russian)

22. Sai Deepak J. (2020, June 5) Bharat: An Indic Civilisation State. The Daily Guardian. Retrieved from https://thedailyguardian.com/bharat-an-indic-civilisation-state/

23. Sai Deepak J. (2021) India That Is Bharat: Coloniality, Civilization, Constitution. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Publications.

24. Singh A.P. (2016, March 21) New Paradigm For India: From Nation-State To Civilizational-State. Swarajya. Retrieved from https://swarajyamag.com/books/new-paradigm-for-india-from-nation-state-to-civilizational-state

25. Soliman M. (2021, September 16) The Return of the Pharaohs: The Rise of Egypt’s Civilization-State. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mei.edu/publications/return-pharaohs-rise-egypts-civilization-state

26. Spiridonova V.I., Sokolova R.I., & Shevchenko V.N. (2016) Russia as a State-Civilization: A Philosophical and Political Analysis. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy (in Russian).

27. Therborn G. (2021) States, Nations, and Civilizations. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 225–242.

28. Vakhitov R. (2005) Nation-State or Civilization-State. ContrTV. Retrieved from http://www.contrtv.ru/common/1211 (in Russian).

29. Zhang W.W. (2012) The China Wave: The Rise of a Civilizational State. Singapore: World Century Publishing Corporation.


Review

For citations:


Spiridonova V.I. Civilizational Self-Identification as a Response to the Neoliberal Crisis. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2023;66(1):77-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-77-97



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)