Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

The Ideas of Hegel and Engels in the Context of the Self-Organization Theory

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-98-119

Abstract

The philosophy of nature, which encompasses the comprehensive study of the natural world, became intimately linked with the interdisciplinary approach of self-organization theory, or synergetics, as it was revealed in the latter third of the 20th century. This novel understanding of reality and its connection to synergetics becomes evident when comparing the panlogism of G.W.F. Hegel and the dialectical materialism of F. Engels, both based on 19th-century scientific achievements, with contemporary issues in natural science. This comparison is justified as the worldviews formulated by Hegel, Marx, and Engels significantly influenced the development of civilization in the 20th century. Similarly, synergetics appears poised to become the cornerstone of the emerging scientific worldview. The philosophical legacies of these classical thinkers play a crucial role in shaping the theory of self-organization. Hegel examined the question of self-development within complex systems and analyzed culture through this perspective, consequently, he can be considered a precursor to synergetics. His viewpoint on the philosophy and methodology of science as a means of reflection within the domain of knowledge remains influential. The evolutionary approach, which Engels regarded as one of the major accomplishments of 19th-century science, now serves as the foundation for numerous contemporary scientific disciplines, including synergetics itself. The philosophical approach to seeking elementary entities, from which the properties of the whole could be discerned, emerged as the driving force in the development of 20th-century science. Concurrently, the challenges confronting humanity have significantly transformed the realm of scientific knowledge. Emphasis has shifted toward the laws governing the interactions of elementary entities, as well as the associated issues of structure, chaos, and self-organization. The roles of mathematical modeling, intra-scientific reflection, and large-scale projects have proven to be more critical than initially anticipated by the classical philosophers. The ongoing humanitarian and technological revolution necessitates new responses to the profound and significant questions originally posed by Hegel and Engels.

About the Authors

Georgiy G. Malinetskiy
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Georgiy G. Malinetskiy – Dr.Sc. in Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Chief Research Fewllow, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Moscow



Vyacheslav E. Voitsekhovich
Tver State University
Russian Federation

Vyacheslav E. Voitsekhovich – Dr.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture, Tver State University.

Tver



Ilya N. Volnov
Moscow Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Ilya N. Volnov – Ph.D. in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Machines and the Technology of Foundry Production, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Moscow Polytechnic University.

Moscow



References

1. Bak P. (2021) How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).

2. Belkin G.L. (Ed.) (2018) The Institute of Man: Idea and Reality. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

3. Chernavskiy D.S. (2017) Synergetics and Information: Dynamic Theory of Information. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

4. Engels F. (1961a) Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 21, pp. 269–317). Moscow: Gospolitizdat (Russian translation).

5. Engels F. (1961b) Anti-Dühring: Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 20, pp. 1–338). Moscow: Gospolitizdat, (Russian translation).

6. Engels F. (1961c) Dialectics of Nature. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 20, pp. 339–626). Moscow: Gospolitizdat (Russian translation).

7. Feynman R. (2002) There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom: An Invitation to Enter a New Field of Physics. Russian Chemical Journal. Vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 4–6 (Russian translation).

8. Girenok F.I. (2021) The Pleasure of Thinking Differently. Moscow: Prospekt (in Russian).

9. Habermas J. (1992) The Modern: An Unfinished Project. Voprosy filosofii, No. 4, pp. 40–51 (Russian translation).

10. Haken H. (1980) Synergetics. Moscow: Mir (Russian translation).

11. Hegel G.W.F. (1974) Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 1: The Science of Logic. Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

12. Hegel G.W.F. (1975) Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 2: Philosophy of Nature. Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

13. Ivanov V.V. & Malinetskiy G.G. (2020) Russia: 21st Century. Breakthrough Strategy. Technologies. Education. Science. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

14. Khaustov D.E. (2018) Lectures on Postmodern Philosophy. Moscow: RIPOL Classic (in Russian).

15. Kuznetsov V. (2014) Reconfigurator 2.0: Program Deployment. In: Russian Philosophy of the 21st Century. Maxims (pp. 79–180). Moscow: IOI (in Russian).

16. Lem S. (2018) Literature and Philosophy, or “I Wanted to Save the World”. Samara: Samarskaya Humanities Academy (Russian translation).

17. Lenin V.I. (1968) Materialism and Empiriocriticism. In: Lenin V.I. Complete Collected Works (Vol. 18). Moscow: Gospolitizdat (in Russian).

18. Malinetskiy G.G. (2021) To Make a Fairy Tale a Reality. High Technologies – Russia’s Path to the Future. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

19. Malinetskiy G.G., Voitsekhovich V.E., & Volnov I.N. (2019) Harmony, Evolution, Applied Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Approaches. SocioTime. No. 3 (19), pp. 17–29 (in Russian).

20. Marx K. (1964) Marx to Ludwig Kugelmann, March 6, 1868. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 32. pp. 447–449). Moscow: Gospolitizdat (Russian translation).

21. Penrose R. (2020) The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).

22. Pereslegin S. & Pereslegina E. (2015) Wild Cards of the Future: Force Majeure for Humanity. Moscow: Algoritm (in Russian).

23. Prigogine I. & Stengers I. (2005) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Moscow: KomKniga (Russian translation).

24. Russell B. (1993a) A History of Western Philosophy. Vol. 1: Book 1: Ancient Philosophy. Book 2: Catholic Philosophy. Moscow: MIF(Russian translation).

25. Russell B. (1993b) A History of Western Philosophy. Vol. 2: Book 3: Philosophy of the New Age. Moscow: MIF (Russian translation).

26. Rovelli C. (2020) The Order of Time. Moscow: AST: CORPUS (Russian translation).

27. Snow C.P. (1973) The Two Cultures: A Collection of Non-Fiction Works. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

28. Stepin V.S. (2018) Man. Activity. Culture. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).

29. Wigner E. (1971) Symmetries and Reflections. Moscow: Mir (Russian translation).

30. Zhuravleva Z.E. (Ed.) (2010) I Need to Be: In Memory of Sergey Pavlovich Kurdyumov. Moscow: URSS (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Malinetskiy G.G., Voitsekhovich V.E., Volnov I.N. The Ideas of Hegel and Engels in the Context of the Self-Organization Theory. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2023;66(1):98-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-1-98-119



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)