“Ideology” vs. Metaphysics: Destutt de Tracy and Maine de Biran
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-4-81-97
Abstract
The article analyzes one of the episodes of the theoretical confrontation between “ideology” and metaphysics. Particular attention is paid to the fact that the conception of Maine de Biran, the ancestor of French spiritualism of the 19th century, emerged in the framework of the school of “ideologists” (idéologues) and gradually constituted in discussions with one of its leading representatives. Destut de Tracy, the author of the term “ideology” (idéologie), rejected the possibility of revealing the essence of things due to the inaccessibility of knowledge about their first reasons. For him, metaphysics is the art of imagination, which has no solid support in experience. The basis of all reliable knowledge, in his opinion, is the science of ideas that is alien to metaphysical dogmatism and focused on the description of phenomena. The early Biran takes a similar position, insisting that man knows the nature of any forces only by their consequences. Later, Biran, starting with distinguishing between active and passive perceptions, comes to confrontation with “ideology.” He highlights the doctrine of will-efforts, not reduced to physiological conditions, in which he sees the basis of the human person. In the late period of Biran’s creative activity, the rejection of anti-metaphysical sensualism leads him to a special form of religious anthropology. In fact, in the local confrontation between “ideology” and metaphysical spiritualism, initial success is on the side of the Biran tradition. But the further development of the history of philosophy suggests that the arguments of both sides, in the new conditions, continued to find their supporters, stimulating the emergence of new concepts. Therefore, the theoretical dispute was not completed at all, it continued at a new developmental stage of European culture, and the opposite approaches were perceived for a long time by many philosophers as having not exhausted all their potential.
About the Author
Artem A. KrotovRussian Federation
Artem A. Krotov – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Head of the Department of History and Theory of the World Culture of the Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Moscow
References
1. Azouvi F. (1992) Maine de Biran. In: Jacob A. (Ed.) Encyclopédie philosophoque universelle. Vol. III: Les œuvres philosophiques (Tome 1, pp. 1948–1951). Paris: PUF (in French).
2. Blauberg I.I. (2021) From the History of French Spiritualism: The Philosophy of Jules Lachelier. Istoriya filosofii. Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 26 – 38 (in Russian)
3. Bréhier E. (2004) Histoire de la philosophie. Paris: PUF (in French).
4. Cousin V. (1847) Fragments philosophiques (Vol. 4). Paris: Ladrange (in French).
5. Damiron Ph. (1834) Essai sur l’histoire de la philosophie en France au XIXe siècle (Vol. 1). Paris: Hachette (in French).
6. Destutt de Tracy A.L.C. (2012) Œuvres complètes. Tome III: Éléments d’idéologie. Idéologie proprement dite. Paris: Vrin (in French).
7. Destutt de Tracy A.L.C. (2017) Œuvres complètes. Tome II: Essais philosophiques. Paris: Vrin (in French).
8. Destutt de Tracy A.L.C. (2018) Œuvres complètes. Tome VIII: Correspondance. Paris: Vrin (in French).
9. Gouhier H. (2001) Maine de Biran. In: Dictionnaire des philosophes (pp. 981–984). Paris: Albin Michel (in French).
10. Guillois A. (2013) Le salon de madame Helvétius. Cabanis et les idéologues. Genève: Slatkine (in French).
11. Ivanova A.S. (2013) The Elements of “Ideology”: Antoine Destutt de Tracy and His Science of Ideas. Voprosy filosofii. No. 8, pp. 146–148 (in Russian).
12. Janet P. & Séailles G. (1921) Histoire de la philosophie. Les problèmes et les écoles. Paris: Delagrave (in French).
13. Janicaud D. (1997) Ravaisson et la métaphysique. Une généalogie du spiritualisme français. Paris: Vrin (in French).
14. Maine de Biran M.F.P. (1931) Journal intime de Maine de Biran. Tome II: de l’année 1817 à l’année 1824. Paris: Plon (in French).
15. Maine de Biran M.F.P. (1957) Journal. Tome III. Agendas, carnets et notes. Neuchâtel: La Baconnière (in French).
16. Maine de Biran M.F.P. (1987) Œuvres. Tome II: Influence de l’habitude sur la faculté de penser. Paris: Vrin (in French).
17. Maine de Biran M.F.P. (1996) Œuvres. Tome XIII-2: Correspondance philosophique (1766–1804). Paris: Vrin (in French).
18. Naville E. (1857) Maine de Biran, sa vie et ses pensées. Paris: Joel Cherbuliez (in French).
19. Picavet F. (1891) Les idéologues. Paris: Félix Alcan (in French).
20. Ravaisson F. (1984) De l’habitude. La philosophie en France au XIXe siècle. Paris: Fayard (in French).
21. Verdenal R. (1999) Le spiritualisme français de Maine de Biran à Hamelin. In: Châtelet F. (Ed.) Histoire de la philosophie. (Vol. 6, pp. 37–65). Paris: Hachette (in French).
22. Vizgin V.P. (2017) Existential Motives in Maine de Biran’s “Diary”. Istoriya filosofii. Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 44–55 (in Russian).
23. Weber A. (1914) Histoire de la philosophie européenne. Paris: Fischbacher (in French).
Review
For citations:
Krotov A.A. “Ideology” vs. Metaphysics: Destutt de Tracy and Maine de Biran. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2022;65(4):81-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-4-81-97