Mediation and Convergent Sociality: Toward a Theory of Social Dialogue

The article investigates the mechanisms shaping a new quality of social development in contemporary Russia amidst growing societal challenges. Four key mechanisms are explored: mediation, social dialogue, polysubjectivity, and convergence. These are analyzed for their role in fostering novel forms of social integration and development. The mechanisms serve as tools for studying and shaping the current interplay between tradition and innovation, cultural stasis and social dynamics across various sociocultural contexts and transitional processes. The paper draws upon works presented at the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Individualization and Collectivism in Contemporary Russian Society,” offering an original interpretation that synthesizes and structures these studies. Notable contributions include V.A. Lektorsky’s concept of “the supra-individual as social universality,” which advances our understanding of socio-individual meaning formation and transcends the individual-society dichotomy. A.A. Auzan’s analysis of the dual-core structure of Russian culture aptly captures the unique challenges of social development in Russia. O.V. Aksenova’s examination of the contradictory nature of social action subjects in an increasingly technologized society illuminates the complexities of balancing freedom with necessity, and uniformity with diversity in social action. V.M. Rozin’s approach is considered for its potential to facilitate mediational social dialogue in Russian society. The author argues that neither the individualistic nor the collectivist cores of Russian culture can independently drive effective modernization. Instead, the concept of convergence is proposed as a means to transcend the extremes of ego-individualism and totalitarian collectivism. Three primary directions for implementing convergent strategies are identified: synthesizing individual and social aspects in social action and dialogue, optimizing center-periphery interactions in governance, and developing public-private partnership models as a form of economic convergence. The study emphasizes the need for new forms of social integration and concludes that Russia’s sustainable social development requires an integrative socio-individual model, combining elements of individual freedom and collective solidarity.

1. Aksenova O.V. (2024) Individualism and Collectivism in the Context of Technological Progress. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 81–96 (in Russian).

2. Akhiezer A.S. (1998) Russia: Critique of Historical Experience. Sociocultural Dynamics of Russia. Vol. 2: Theory and Methodology. Dictionary (2nd ed.). Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf (in Russian).

3. Bauman Z. (2005) The Individualized Society (V.L. Inozemtsev, Ed. & Trans.). Moscow: Logos (Russian translation).

4. Bush R.A.B. & Folger J.P. (2004) The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

5. Carnegie D. (2024) How to Win Friends and Influence People. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

6. Dashichev V.I. (2011) Theory of Convergence and Russia’s Path: From Past Mistakes to Choosing the Future. Prostranstvo i vremya. No. 4, pp. 72–87 (in Russian).

7. Davydov A.P. (2020) Methodological “Middle” as a Tool for Studying Social Reality. In: Gorshkov M.K. (Ed.) Reforming Russia: Yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 529–564). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

8. Davydov A.P. (2021) Methodological “Middle-for” from the Perspective of V. Lektorsky’s Non-Classics, A. Akhiezer’s Mediation, and R. Grinberg / A. Rubinstein’s Principle of Complementarity. Voprosy filosofii. No. 4, pp. 191–202 (in Russian).

9. Davydov A.P. (2023) Individualism and Collectivism as a Subject of Social-Philosophical Analysis (Reflections on the Eve of the Scientific Conference “Individualization and Collectivism in Contemporary Russian Society”). Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 140–159.

10. Davydov A.P. (2024) Russia in Spring 2022: The Split in Society as the Basis of Sociocultural Crisis. VOX: Philosophical Journal. Vol. 45 (in Russian).

11. Freud S. (1999) The Ego and the Id: Works. Moscow: Eksmo-Press; Kharkov: Folio (Russian translation).

12. Horkheimer M. (2011) Eclipse of Reason. Moscow: Kanon+ (Russian translation).

13. Horkheimer M. & Adorno T. (1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Moscow: Medium; Saint Petersburg: Yuventa (Russian translation).

14. Huntington S. (2014) The Clash of Civilizations (T. Velimeev, Trans.). Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

15. Kasavin I.T. & Porus V.N. (1999) From the Editors. In: Kasavin I.T. & Porus V.N. (Eds.) Mind and Existence: Analysis of Scientific and Non-Scientific Forms of Thinking (pp. 9–20). Saint Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute (in Russian).

16. Lektorsky V.A. (2004) Is the Integration of Natural Sciences and Human Sciences Possible? Voprosy filosofii. No. 3, pp. 44–49 (in Russian).

17. Lektorsky V.A. (2009) Classical and Non-Classical Epistemology. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

18. Lektorsky V.A. (2024) Individualization, Collectivity, Dialogue. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 13–25 (in Russian).

19. Marinosyan A.K. (2024) Instrumental Reason as a Third Subjectivity in the Self–Other System. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 117–134 (in Russian).

20. Moiseev N.N. (1995) Modern Rationalism. Moscow: MGVP KOKS (in Russian).

21. Rozin V.M. (2024) Social Dialogue as a Problem and Prerequisite for Mediation. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 65–80 (in Russian).

22. Savelev I.A. (2024) Polysubjectivity as a Factor of Social Development in the Context of Dialogization and Differentiation of Center–Region Relations in the Federal State. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 97–116 (in Russian).