Individualization, Collectivity, Dialogue

The article examines the processes of individualization in relation to the emergence and existence of various forms of collectivity. It analyzes the complexities of this process, which, while a necessary characteristic of modern society, can lead to atomization, frustration, and loss of meaning in life. Particular attention is paid to the nature of individualization: on one hand, it presupposes the uniqueness of each individual; on the other, it is inextricably linked to an individual’s association with certain collectives and the internalization of supra-individual values. The article asserts that new forms of collectivity are emerging in the modern era that, rather than suppressing individuality, foster creative self-realization. The research explores issues of depersonalization and pseudo-collectivity, as well as the interplay between freedom and responsibility in the context of global digitalization. The author elucidates the dangers associated with the virtualization of personality, the erosion of boundaries between private and public spheres, and the potential for total control over individuals. Contemporary forms of virtual individualization, while creating an illusion of freedom, may in fact lead to a loss of personal individuality. The article further explores the impact of digital technologies on the transformation and evolution of both individual and collective memory, as well as their role in shaping identity. It underscores that digitalization not only offers new opportunities but also poses significant anthropological challenges. Dialogue is examined as a means of resolving conflicts and facilitating both individual and collective self-realization. The author contrasts M.M. Bakhtin’s dialogical approach with J.-P. Sartre’s existentialist interpretation of the relationship between the Self and the Other. It is emphasized that genuine dialogue requires mutual recognition and respect among participants, a shared space for communication, and a willingness to reconsider one’s own position. In conclusion, the study posits that addressing many of the problems generated by modern processes of individualization and collectivization in the age of global digitalization necessitates the creation of conditions conducive to interpersonal, intergroup, and intercultural dialogue.

1. Akhiezer A.S. (2008) Russia: A Critique of Historical Experience (3rd ed.). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

2. Akhiezer A.S. & Shurovsky M.A. (2005) From Dialogue to Dialogization (in Light of V.S. Bibler’s Concept). Voprosy filosofii. No. 3, pp. 58–70 (in Russian).

3. Bakhtin M.M. (1986) Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo (in Russian).

4. Bauman Z. (2005) The Individualized Society (V.L. Inozemtsev, Ed. & Trans.). Moscow: Logos (Russian translation).

5. Frankl V. (1990) Man’s Search for Meaning. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

6. Heidegger M. (1997) Being and Time (V.V. Bibikhin, Trans.). Moscow: Ad Marginem (Russian translation).

7. Husserl E. (2010) Cartesian Meditations (V.I. Molchanov, Trans.). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt (Russian translation).

8. Lektorsky V.A. (2018) Social Technologies and Man. In: Lektorsky V.A. Man and Culture. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).

9. Lektorsky V.A. (2019) Culture, Society, Mediation. A.S. Akhiezer’s Theory. Filosofskie nauki = Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 9–15 (in Russian).

10. Lektorsky V.A. (2020) Individual and Collective Memory: Old Problems and New Challenges. Voprosy filosofii. No. 6, pp. 11–17 (in Russian).

11. Lektorsky V.A. (2022) Global Digitalization as an Anthropological Challenge. In: Lektorsky V.A. (Ed.) Man and Artificial Intelligence Systems (pp. 18–29). Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr (in Russian).

12. Meyer-Schonberger V. (2011) Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13. Ricœur P. (2000) Time and Narrative (2 Vols.; T.V. Slavko, Trans.). Moscow: TsGNII INION RAN; Saint Petersburg: Kulturnaya initsiativa (Russian translation).

14. Ricœur P. (2004) Memory, History, Forgetting (I.I. Blauberg et al., Trans.). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoy literatury (Russian translation).

15. Sarbin T.R. (Ed.) (1986) Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger.

16. Sartre J.-P. (2000) Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (V.I. Kolyadko, Trans. & Foreword). Moscow: Respublika (Russian translation).

17. Schwab K. & Mallerte T. (2020) COVID-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: Forum publishing.