Polysubjectivity as a Factor of Social Development in the Context of Dialogization and Differentiation of Center–Region Relations in the Federal State

The article explores the phenomenon of polysubjectivity as a factor of social development from the perspective of post-non-classical scientific methodology. The author proposes conceptualizing polysubjectivity (multiple subjectivity) as a category describing the multifaceted nature, diversity, and dynamics of the social environment. This environment is formed through the dialogue of managed subjects who are bearers of diverse value-goal structures, possess certain resources, and are interconnected with other subjects of social action. Attention is drawn to the dual nature of poly-subjectivity. On one hand, it is viewed as the subjectivity of multiple individuals and social groups united within a localized social environment, for example, in the context of interactions between government and business, authorities and the population, or the federal center and regions. On the other hand, polysubjectivity is interpreted as the multifaceted and plural subjectivity of an individual. The author draws upon the methodology for analyzing sociocultural modernization of regions (N.I. Lapin), the activity-structural paradigm (A.V. Tikhonov), concepts of mediation and sociocultural dialogue (A.S. Akhiezer, A.P. Davydov), and the subject-oriented approach in social systems management (V.E. Lepskiy). Special attention is given to the role of the polysubjective approach in the context of differentiation among Russian regions and the implementation of their socio-economic development strategies. The article argues that the objective complexity of the Russian Federation's regional composition and the unevenness of modernization necessitate a polysubjective approach to structuring relations between the center and regions. Invoking W.R. Ashby’s law of requisite variety, it is demonstrated that effective management of regional system diversity requires a corresponding diversity of management approaches at the central level. Barriers to the formation of polysubjectivity are analyzed, particularly the absence of genuine dialogue between the center and regions. The conclusion posits that polysubjectivity can serve as a key characteristic of a certain stage in the institutionalization of post-industrial type management and as a form of interaction that ensures an adequate measure of collaboration among representatives of government, business, science, and various communities.

1. Akhiezer A.S. (1997) Russia: Critique of Historical Experience: Sociocultural Dynamics of Russia. Vol. 1: From the Past to the Future (2nd ed.). Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf (in Russian).

2. Arshinov V.I. & Budanov V.G. (2019) V.S. Stepin’s Concept of Post-Non-Classical Science and N.N. Moiseev’s Concept of Universal Evolutionism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 96–112 (in Russian).

3. Ashby W.R. (1958) Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems. Cybernetica. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–99.

4. Ashby W.R. (1959) An Introduction to Cybernetics (D.G. Lakhuti, Trans.). Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura (Russian translation).

5. Davydov A.P. (2018) The Basis of Development as a Socio-Cultural Issue (On the Question of the Mediation Theory of Western Society’s Evolution). Vestnik instituta sotziologii. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–51 (in Russian).

6. Davydov A.P. (2023) Individualism and Collectivism as a Subject of Social-Philosophical Analysis (Reflections on the Eve of the Scientific Conference “Individualization and Collectivism in Contemporary Russian Society”). Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 140–159 (in Russian).

7. Drobizheva L.M. (2019) The Policy of Integration of Multiethnic Russian Society in Doctrinal Documents, Political Science Discourse and Mass Consciousness. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. No. 4, pp. 134–146 (in Russian).

8. Fedosyuk Ya.V. (2015) Patterns and Principles of Cybernetics as a Theoretical and Methodological Basis for the Formation of Management Teams. Research Result = Nauchnyy rezultat. Sociology and Management. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 89‒92 (in Russian).

9. Fedotova N.N. (2014) Toward the Theory of Identity as a Process. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. No. 11, pp. 70–81 (in Russian).

10. Grigorieva E.A. & Stoyanov A.S. (2020) Awareness and Expectations when Choosing a University and Profession. GosReg: gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. No. 2, pp. 256–267 (in Russian).

11. Lapin N.I. (Ed.) (2016) Atlas of Modernization of Russia and its Regions: Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Trends and Problems. Moscow: Ves’ mir (in Russian).

12. Lepskiy V.E. (2019) Public Participation in Self-Developing Polysubject Environments. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr (in Russian).

13. Lepskiy V.E. (2022) Solidary Society as a Self-Developing Polysubject Environment (Harmony of Hierarchies, Networks and Environments). Mestnoe pravo. No. 3, pp. 11–20 (in Russian).

14. Markova L.A. (2012) Polysubjectivity as the Basis of Communication. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 55–69 (in Russian).

15. Merzlyakov A.A. (Ed.) (2023) Regulation of Interregional Inequality: From Diagnostics to Modeling. Moscow: RAS Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology (in Russian).

16. Savelyev I.A. (2021) Content Analysis of Official Websites of Authorities and Management Bodies of the Russian Federation Subjects with Different Levels of Sociocultural Modernization as an Information Resource for Regional Group Formation. In: A.V. Tikhonov & A.A. Merzlyakov (Eds.) Reforming the Power-Management Vertical in the Context of Implementing National Projects and Activating the Processes of Spontaneous Group Formation (pp. 283–302). Moscow: RAS Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology (in Russian).

17. Savelyev I.A. (2022) Implementation of the Strategy of Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation Regions in the Context of Reducing the Negative Consequences of Socio-Economic Inequalities. Voprosy upravleniya. No. 6, pp. 36–47 (in Russian).

18. Smolina E.G. (2020) Interaction of Local Executive Authorities and the Population in the Internet Space: Management Aspect (Based on Materials from Volgograd) (dissertation). Nizhny Novgorod (in Russian).

19. Stepin V.S. (2013) Types of Scientific Rationality and the Synergetic Paradigm. Slozhnost. Razum. Postneklassika. No. 4, pp. 45–59 (in Russian).

20. Stoyanov A.S. & Filkova V.N. (2020) Factors of Negative Attitude towards Military Service (On the Example of Conscripts in Khimki). Sotsiologiya. No. 2, pp. 173–180 (in Russian).

21. Tikhonov A.V. (2015) Study of the Problems of Reforming the Power-Management Vertical. Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya. No. 39, pp. 163–175 (in Russian).

22. Vachkov I.V. (2014) Polysubject Interaction in the Educational Environment. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 36–50 (in Russian).

23. Yahyaoui Krivenko E. (2023) The Logic of Human Rights: From Subject/Object Dichotomy to Topo-Logic. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.