Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Prolegomena to the Systemic-Dialectical Problematization of Dialogue

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-2-46-64

Abstract

The article presents the results of the initial stage of a systemic-dialectical problematization of dialogue. The study aims to establish a transdisciplinary theoretical and cognitive model of dialogue. The research addresses the problem of rethinking the conceptual framework of dialogue and the attribution of its special forms due to the inclusion of artificial intelligence in the communicative architectonics of post-culture. The primary focus is on the applicability of philosophical ideas about dialogue and its epistemology in exploring the essence and existence of dialogue within the context of technologically updated intersubjectivity. By juxtaposing the concepts of M. Buber, M.M. Bakhtin, V.S. Bibler, J. Lotman, N. Luhmann, J. Habermas, and other scholars, the article outlines the contours of areas that have not yet been problematized in philosophical interpretations of dialogue and communication. A hypothesis is proposed that dialogue may be conceptualized as a post-non-classical universal of a distinct nature. The research substantiates the efficacy of employing a systemic approach and dialectical methodology for the problematization of dialogue in epistemological and methodological aspects. The study identifies categories and concepts germane to dialogue analysis. It elucidates the transformations of dialogue into dialogue systems, the subject into a dialogue agent, and meaning-constitution into meaning-construction. Furthermore, the research posits a qualitative shift in dialogue within the context of artificially intelligent communication in media reality. It reveals that the comprehension of these processes in philosophical and scientific knowledge about dialogue creates a new epistemological situation that can be problematized. This, in turn, necessitates a robust theoretical and methodological problematization grounded in a systemic-dialectical approach, facilitating reflection on both the content of dialogue-related knowledge and its research methodology, as well as on dialogue itself, which ceases to be a phenomenon of purely human communication.

About the Author

Tatiana A. Leshchenko
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Leshchenko – Ph.D. in Sociology, Associate Professor of the Scientific and Educational Center, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Moscow



References

1. Ackoff R.L. & Emery F.E. (2008) On Purposeful Systems. Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).

2. Akhutin A.V. (2018) The Philosophical Mentality. Moscow: RIPOL klassik (in Russian).

3. Arendt H. (1996) The Origins of Totalitarianism. Moscow: TsentrKom (Russian translation).

4. Bakhtin M.M. (1997a) On the Philosophical Foundations of the Humanities. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 7–10). Moscow: Russkie slovari (in Russian).

5. Bakhtin M.M. (1997b) From Archival Notes to the Work “The Problem of Speech Acts.” In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 207–286). Moscow: Russkie slovari (in Russian).

6. Bakhtin M.M. (2002a) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 6: Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Works of the 1960s–1970s (pp. 6–300). Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury (in Russian).

7. Bakhtin M.M. (2002b) Working Notes of the 1960s–1970s. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 371–439). Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kult’ury (in Russian).

8. Bibler V.S. (1991) From Science Teaching – to the Logic of Culture: Two Philosophical Introduction to the Twenty-First Century. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

9. Bibler V.S. (2014) Mikhail Mikhaylovich Bakhtin or Poetics of Culture. Moscow: DirectMEDIA (in Russian).

10. Buber M. (1995) Two Types of Faith. Moscow: Respublika (Russian translation).

11. Davydov A.P. (2020) The “Middle” as a Methodological Tool for Studying Social Reality. In: Gorshkov M.K. (Ed.) Reforming Russia: Yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 529–564). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

12. Epstein M.N. (2004) Blank Space: On the Future of the Humanities. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (in Russian).

13. Epstein M.N. (2019) Russian Postmodernism. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka; Azbuka-Attikus (in Russian).

14. Gadamer H.-G. (1991) The Relevance of the Beautiful. Moscow: Iskusstvo (Russian translation).

15. Gogotishvili (1997a) Commentary. On the Philosophical Foundations of the Humanities. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 386–401). Moscow: Russkie slovari (in Russian).

16. Gogotishvili(1997b) Commentary. From Archival Notes to the Work “The Problem of Speech Acts.” In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 555–591). Moscow: Russkie slovari (in Russian).

17. Gogotishvili (2002) Commentary. Working Notes of the 1960s – Early 1970s. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works. Vol. 5: Works of the 1940s – Early 1960s (pp. 533–701). Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kult’ury (in Russian).

18. Habermas J. (2022) The Theory of Communicative Action (Vols. 1–2). Moscow: Ves’ mir (Russian translation).

19. Hegel G.W.F. (1968) Aesthetics (Vol. 1). Moscow: Iskusstvo (Russian translation).

20. Husserl E. (2010) Cartesian Meditations. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt (Russian translation).

21. Ignatyev V.I. (2021) Problem of the Techno-Subject: On the Subjectivity of “Entity-Constructors”. Ideas and Ideals. Vol. 13, no. 1, p.1, pp.130–150 (in Russian).

22. Jaspers K. (2021) Philosophy. Vol. 2: Enlightenment of Existence. Moscow: Kanon-Plyus (Russian translation).

23. Kant I. (2007) Metaphysics of Morals. In: Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. The Critique of Practical Reason. Metaphysics of Morals (pp. 261–502). Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).

24. Kojève A. (2007) Atheism and Other Works. Moscow: Praksis (Russian translation).

25. Kosilova E.V. & Frolov A.V. (2017) Internet from the Viewpoint of Transcendental Philosophy and Phenomenology. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy. No. 6, pp. 18–29 (in Russian).

26. Lanyi G. (2024, February 12) The Age of Machinoids. In: AI & Society: Knowledge, Culture and Communication. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-023-01858-z

27. Lektorsky V.A. (2001) Classical and Non-Classical Epistemology. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

28. Lepsky V.E. (2016) Analytics of the Assembly of Development Subjects. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr (in Russian).

29. Levin G.D. (2012) Dialogue as a Form of Communication. In: Levin G.D. & Trufanova E.O. (Eds.) Philosophy of Science. Issue 17: Epistemological Analysis of Communication (pp. 228–239). Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy (in Russian).

30. Losev A.F. (2009) Philosophy of the Name. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt (in Russian).

31. Lotman J.M. (2004) Semiosphere: Culture and Explosion. Inside the Thinking Worlds. Notes. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB (in Russian).

32. Luhmann N. (2005) The Reality of the Mass Media. Moscow: Praksis (Russian translation).

33. Luhmann N. (1995) What Is Communication? Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. No. 3, pp.114–124 (Russian translation).

34. Mamardashvili M.K. (2004) Classical and Non-Classical Ideals of Rationality. Moscow: Logos (in Russian).

35. McTear M. (2021) End-to-End Neural Dialogue Systems. In: McTear M. Conversational AI. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies (pp. 125–158). Cham: Springer.

36. Merleau-Ponty M. (1999) Phenomenology of Perception. Saint Petersburg: Yuventa; Nauka (Russian translation).

37. Motroshilova N.V. (2017) Contemporary Corrections to Understanding of Theories of Dialogues and their Implementation in “Life World” (Experience of Sociology of Knowledge). Part I. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. No. 2, pp. 35–49 (in Russian).

38. Myasnikova L.A. & Kuznetsova N.M. (1986) On the Methodological Function of Understanding in Scientific Knowledge. In: Pivovarov D.V. (Ed.) Scientific Method and Methodological Sense (pp. 83–89). Sverdlovsk: Ural State University (in Russian).

39. Rozin V.M. (2023) Concepts and Definitions of Artificial and Natural Intelligence: A Methodological Analysis. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 7–25 (in Russian).

40. Rozov N.S. (2017) Conceptualization of the Structure/Agency Relationship. Philosophy and Society = Filosofiya i obschestvo. No. 1, pp. 29–47 (in Russian).

41. Savchuk V.V. (2014) Media Philosophy. Attack Reality. Saint Petersburg: RKHGA (in Russian).

42. Sokuler Z.A. (2008) Hermann Cohen and Philosophy of Dialogue. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya (in Russian).

43. Stepin V.S. (2011) Civilization and Culture. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).

44. Stepin V.S. (2019) Human. Activity. Culture. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Leshchenko T.A. Prolegomena to the Systemic-Dialectical Problematization of Dialogue. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2024;67(2):46-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-2-46-64



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)