Dialogue Between the Individual and the Social: A Framework for Synthesizing Socio-Economic Theories of Value Evolution
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-4-47-71
Abstract
The current phase of socio-economic development, characterized by accelerated scientific and technological change, urgently raises the question of balancing three crucial components: technological, institutional, and cultural. In this context, comprehensive studies of societal processes are particularly relevant, especially focusing on their primary subject – the individual – and identifying the optimal interplay between individualistic and socially oriented aspirations that can mitigate crises arising from imbalances between technological advancement and human values. As Academician V.M. Polterovich argues, attempts to develop a generalized theory of socio-economic development based on monocausal frameworks have proven inadequate. The article explores various interdisciplinary theoretical approaches to address this challenge. It analyzes the framework developed by D. North, J. Wallis, and B. Weingast, which emphasizes the significant role of culture and values in shaping societal institutional structures. Attention is also given to V.M. Polterovich’s theory advocating a transition from a philosophy of competition to a philosophy of cooperation, which posits the reconciliation of individual interests with collective goals. The sociological research of V.S. Magun and M.G. Rudnev, which identifies a population segment embracing “growth values” that combine individualistic aspirations with social responsibility, is given significant attention. Furthermore, the article considers the theory of economic synergetics proposed by L.P. and R.N. Evstigneev, which offers a reinterpretation of traditional economic categories by incorporating anthropological, value-based, and sociocultural factors. The Evstigneevs’ concept aims to transcend the dichotomy between state and market by viewing them as components of a broader societal system comprising numerous interacting agents at different levels, united by a communicative space of development. We conclude that successful social transformations hinge on achieving a balance between technological progress and sociocultural development, which, in turn, requires the formation of new types of social bonds and communicative spaces, and the cultivation of a mediation mindset.
About the Author
Natalya M. PliskevichRussian Federation
Natalya M. Pliskevich – Senior Research Fellow, Center for Economic Theory of the Social Sector, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Issues of Economic Theory Journal.
Moscow
References
1. Akhiezer A.S. (1998) Russia: Critique of Historical Experience. Vol. 2: Theory and Methodology. Dictionary. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf (in Russian).
2. Akhiezer A.S. (2008) Man in Search of the Fullness of Being. In: Akhiezer A.S. Works (Vol. 2, pp. 11–283). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).
3. Balatsky E.V. (2021) The Principle of Consistency in the Theory of Social Development. Terra Economicus. Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 36–52 (in Russian).
4. Balatsky E.V. & Pliskevich N.M. (2017) Economic Growth Under Extractive Institutions: The Soviet Paradox and Current Events. Mir Rossii. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 97–117 (in Russian).
5. Davydov A.P. (2023) Individualism and Collectivism as a Subject of Social-Philosophical Analysis (Reflections on the Eve of the Scientific Conference “Individualization and Collectivism in Contemporary Russian Society”). Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 140–159.
6. Eisenstadt S.N. (2010) Modernization Failures. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. No. 6, pp. 42–67 (in Russian).
7. Evstigneeva L.P. & Evstigneev R.N. (2011) New Facets of Mentality: Synergistic Approach. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
8. Evstigneeva L.P. & Evstigneev R.N. (2016) Strategy of Economic Development of Russia: Theoretical Aspect. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
9. Gudkov L.D. (2022) The Inertia of State Paternalism and Its Consequences. Journal of the New Economic Association. No. 5, pp. 153–161 (in Russian).
10. Hellman J. (1998) Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics. Vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 203–234.
11. Libman A.M. (2023) Interdisciplinary Research and Mixed Methods: Prospects and Limitations. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki = Issues of Economic Theory. No. 3, pp. 35–48 (in Russian).
12. Magun V.S. (2023) The Evolution of Basic Values of the Russian Population, 2006–2021. Sociological Studies = Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. No. 12, pp. 44–58 (in Russian).
13. Magun V.S. & Rudnev M.G. (2021) Beyond the “Soviet Man”: Russians in the European Value Typology. In: Rogov K. (Ed.) The Dismantling of Communism. Thirty Years Later (pp. 325–353). Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (in Russian).
14. Nazaretian A.P. (2017) Nonlinear Future. Megahistory, Synergetics, Cultural Anthropology and Psychology in Global Forecasting. Moscow: Argamak-Media (in Russian).
15. North D. (2010) Understanding the Process of Economic Change (K. Martynov & N. Edelman, Trans.). Moscow: HSE Publishing House (Russian translation).
16. North D., Wallis J., & Weingast B. (2011) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History (D. Uelaner, M. Markov, D. Raskov & A. Raskova, Trans.). Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press (Russian translation).
17. North D., Wallis J., Webb S., & Weingast B. (2012) In the Shadow of Violence: Lessons for Societies with Limited Access to Political and Economic Activity (M. Dondukovsky & E. Leontyeva, Trans.). Moscow: HSE Publishing House (Russian translation).
18. Pliskevich N.M. (2022) Institutional Scars in “Borderline” Societies and the Evolution of Human Potential (Part 1: Institutional Scars). Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki = Issues of Economic Theory. No. 3, pp. 130–143 (in Russian).
19. Pliskevich N.M. (2023) Institutional Scars in “Borderline” Societies (Part 2: Institutional Scars in the History of Russian Transformation and Changes in Value Orientations). Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki = Issues of Economic Theory. No. 1, pp. 60–82 (in Russian).
20. Polterovich V.M. (2007) Elements of the Theory of Reforms. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).
21. Polterovich V.M. (2018a) Toward a General Theory of Socio-Economic Development. Part 1: Geography, Institutions or Culture? Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 11, pp. 5–26 (in Russian).
22. Polterovich V.M. (2018b) Towards a General Theory of Socio-Economic Development. Part 2: The Evolution of Coordination Mechanisms. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 12, pp. 77–102 (in Russian).
23. Polterovich V.M. (2022) On the Way to a General Theory of Socio-Economic Development: Towards a Synthesis of Two Canons. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki = Issues of Economic Theory. No. 1, pp. 48–57 (in Russian).
24. Schwartz S.H. (1994) Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 19–45.
25. Yakovlev A.A. (2020) The Search for Institutional Solutions Through the Prism of History. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. No. 2, pp. 57–63 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Pliskevich N.M. Dialogue Between the Individual and the Social: A Framework for Synthesizing Socio-Economic Theories of Value Evolution. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2024;67(4):47-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2024-67-4-47-71