Understanding Social Dialogue: Typology of Approaches and Problems of Conceptualization

The article addresses the issue of conceptualizing social dialogue as both a mechanism of interaction among various social actors and as an instrument of social development. While social dialogue was initially associated with labor relations, contemporary social changes necessitate expanding its scope and institutionalization. The paper presents the philosophical foundations of dialogue, which establish the groundwork for understanding it as a means of achieving mutual understanding and creating new meanings. Organizational dialogue theories offer specific strategies and methodologies for conducting effective dialogue. The authors also explore deliberative governance and deliberative democracy approaches, enabling the comprehension of dialogue within a broader political and social context. Analysis of key conceptualization issues in social dialogue requires defining its participants, objectives, subject matter, and conditions for effectiveness. Various types of social dialogue are identified and analyzed, including transformational, consensus-based, cognitive-innovative, and monitoring dialogues. Each type is examined in terms of its potential and limitations in addressing different social challenges. The article also raises questions about the boundaries of the applicability of dialogical approaches and their relationship with other forms of social interaction and governance. The authors discuss the demarcation between the realm of social dialogue and administrative management, as well as the integration of dialogical processes into existing managerial structures. Issues regarding the role of the state in social dialogue and the balance between formal and informal dialogue mechanisms are also considered. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach to the study of social dialogue, arguing that it can serve as a powerful tool for bridging the gap between individual aspirations and collective interests, thereby fostering socio-individual convergence.

1. Berger P. & Luckmann T. (1995) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (E.D. Rudkevich, Trans.). Moscow: Medium (Russian translation).

2. Bibler V.S. (2002) Contrivances in 2 Vols. (Vol. 1). Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities (in Russian).

3. Bohm D. (2004) On Dialogue. London: Routledge Classics.

4. Bush R.A.B. & Folger J.P. (2004) The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

5. Davydov A.P. (2020) Methodological “Middle” as a Tool for Studying Social Reality. In: Gorshkov M.K. (Ed.) Reforming Russia: Yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 529–564). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

6. Davydov A.P. (2023) Individualism and Collectivism as a Subject of Social-Philosophical Analysis (Reflections on the Eve of the Scientific Conference “Individualization and Collectivism in Contemporary Russian Society”). Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 140–159.

7. Davydov A.P. (2024) Mediation and Convergent Sociality: Toward a Theory of Social Dialogue. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 135–159 (in Russian).

8. Dryzek J.S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.

9. Dryzek J.S. & Niemeyer S. (2008) Discursive Representation. American Political Science Review. Vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 481–493.

10. Fishkin J.S. (2009) Virtual Public Consultation: Prospects for Internet Deliberative Democracy. In: Davies T. & Gangadharan S.P. (Eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice (pp. 23–35). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

11. Forester J. (2013) On the Theory and Practice of Critical Pragmatism: Deliberative Practice and Creative Negotiations. Planning Theory. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–22.

12. Forester J. & Theckethil R.K. (2009) Rethinking Risk Management Policies: From “Participation” to Processes of Dialogue, Debate, and Negotiation. In: Paleo U.F. (Ed.) Building Safer Communities. Risk Governance, Spatial Planning and Responses to Natural Hazards (pp. 34–43). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

13. Gergen K.J., McNamee S., & Barrett F.J. (2001) Toward a Vocabulary of Transformative Dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 24, no. 7–8, pp. 697–707.

14. Healey P., De Magalhaes C., Madanipour A., & Pendlebury J. (2003) Place, Identity and Local Politics: Analysing Initiatives in Deliberative Governance. In: Hajer M. & Wagenaar H. (Eds.) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 60–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15. Hendriks C.M. (2009) Deliberative Governance in the Context of Power. Policy and Society. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 173–184.

16. Innes J.E. & Booher D.E. (2003) Collaborative Policymaking: Governance Through Dialogue. In: Hajer M. & Wagenaar H. (Eds.) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17. Isaacs W. (1999) Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. New York: Currency.

18. Kurbatov V.I. (2014) Social Dialogue: Conceptual Analysis. Humanities of the South of Russia. No. 1, pp. 103–112 (in Russian).

19. Lektorsky V.A. (2024) Individualization, Collectivity, Dialogue. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 13–25 (in Russian).

20. Levin G.D. (2024) Epistemological Analysis of the Negotiation Process. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 26–45.

21. Mouffe C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

22. Putnam R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

23. Shapiro I. (2017) Collusion in Restraint of Democracy: Against Political Deliberation. Daedalus. Vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 77–84.

24. Susskind L.E. (1999) A Short Guide to Consensus Building. In: Susskind L.E., McKearnen S., & Thomas-Lamar J. (Eds.) The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement (pp. 3–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25. Yankelovich D. (1999) The Magic of Dialogue: Transforming Conflict into Cooperation. New York: Simon & Schuster.