

Humankind and the World at the Point of Bifurcation
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-1-92-115
Abstract
The article examines the developmental prospects of civilization from the perspective of self-organization theory and synergetics, which are becoming foundational for understanding the processes of the 21st century. The author argues that the contemporary world is at a bifurcation point, characterized by a loss of stability in its previous developmental trajectory. At this fateful juncture, the very structure of society and the guiding principles of human evolution are being forged anew. The analysis covers four fundamentally different future scenarios: (1) the rise of a digital hyper-empire built on total control; (2) a retreat into a pre-modern religious worldview, heralding a “New Middle Ages”; (3) a purely technocratic leap, symbolized by the ambitions of Elon Musk; and (4) the humanistic vision proposed by the philosopher I.T. Frolov. The author provides a detailed examination of the negative consequences of the first three scenarios. The era of the hyper-empire and hyper-control would lead to the loss of individual freedom, the erosion of social bonds, the dominance of algorithmic governance, and poses the threat of dehumanization. The project of a “New Middle Ages,” theorized by N.A. Berdyaev, courts regression into irrationalism and tribalism, leading to civilizational stagnation. The technological breakthrough scenario, despite its apparent successes, entails risks of strategic failure due to an excessive focus on technological dominance at the expense of humanistic and social considerations. The most viable and hopeful alternative presented is the “Frolovian scenario,” which advocates for holistic human progress rooted in scientific humanism. This paradigm places the moral and cultural flourishing of the person at its center, viewing technology as a means rather than an end. It is this approach, the author argues, that holds the promise of guiding humanity through the current instability toward a balanced and sustainable future. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity for each individual to recognize their responsibility for the current historical choice, a decision upon which the destiny of our species hangs.
About the Author
Georgiy G. MalinetskiyRussian Federation
Georgiy G. Malinetskiy – D.Sc. in Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Chief Research Fewllow, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow
References
1. Attali J. (2014) A Brief History of the Future (E. Panteleeva, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Piter (Russian translation).
2. Berdyaev N.A. (2002) The New Middle Ages. In: Berdyaev N.A. The Meaning of History. The New Middle Ages (V.V. Sapov, Comp. & Comm.; pp. 220–310). Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).
3. Braudel F. (2007) Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century. Vol. 1: The Structures of Everyday Life: The Possible and the Impossible (L.E. Kubbel’, Trans.). Moscow: Ves’ mir (Russian translation).
4. Fogel R. & Engerman S.L. (1974) Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
5. Forrester J.W. (2003) World Dynamics (A. Voroshchuk & S. Pegov, Trans.). Moscow: AST; Saint Petersburg: Terra Fantastica (Russian translation).
6. Friedman G. (2010) The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century (A. Kalinin, V. Naritsa, & M. Matskovskaya, Trans.). Moscow: Eksmo (Russian translation).
7. Frolov I.T. (2013) Perspectives of Man: An Experience in a Comprehensive Formulation of the Problem, Discussions, and Generalizations (4th ed.). Moscow: LKI Publishing (in Russian).
8. Girenok F.I. (2021) The Pleasure of Thinking Differently. Moscow: Prospekt (in Russian).
9. Gordon R.J. (2012, August) Is US Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18315. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w18315.
10. Harari Y.N. (2018) Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow (A. Andreev, Trans.). Moscow: Sindbad (Russian translation).
11. Kapitsa S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., & Malinetskiy G.G. (1997) Synergetics and Forecasts of the Future. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
12. Kleinert A. (2009) Der messende Luchs: Zwei verbreitete Fehler in der Galilei-Literatur. NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 199–206 (in German).
13. Korotaev A.V. (2007) Macrodynamics of the World-System Urbanization: A Quantitative Analysis. In: Malkov S.Yu., Grinin L.E., & Korotaev A.V. (Eds.) History and Mathematics: Macrohistorical Dynamics of Society and State (pp. 21–39). Moscow: KomKniga (in Russian).
14. Kurzweil R. (2015) How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed (G.P. Mosolova, Trans.). Moscow: E Publishing (Russian translation).
15. Lee K.-F. (2019) AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order (N. Konstantinova, Trans.; V. Lyalin & O. Kopit, Eds.). Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber (Russian translation).
16. Malinetskiy G.G. (2021) The Philosophical Context of the Cosmic Pause. In: Gonotskaya N.V. (Ed.) Philosophical Essays. Issue 12: Culture. History. Cognition (pp. 141–157). Moscow: Publisher Vorob’ev A.V. (in Russian).
17. Malinetskiy G.G. (2022a) Synergetics as a New Style of Thinking: Subject Knowledge, Mathematical Modeling, and Philosophical Reflection in the New Reality. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
18. Malinetskiy G.G. (2022b) It Is Not Worth Returning to the 16th Century. In: Malinetskiy G.G. (Ed.) Designing the Future. Problems of Digital Reality: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference (Moscow, February 3–4, 2022) (pp. 43–64). Moscow: Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics (in Russian).
19. Moiseev N.N. (2022) The Ecology of Mankind through the Eyes of a Mathematician: Man, Nature, and the Future of Civilization (2nd ed.). Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
20. Poston T. & Stewart I. (1980) Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications (A.V. Chernavskiy, Trans.). Moscow: Mir (Russian translation).
21. Schwab K. (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: E Publishing (Russian translation).
22. Snow C.P. (1973) The Two Cultures (Yu.S. Rodman, Trans.; A.I. Arnol’dov, Ed.). Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).
23. Stoltzenberg D. (1994) Fritz Haber: Chemiker, Nobelpreisträger, Deutscher, Jude. Weinheim: VCH (in German).
24. Tuchman B.W. (2020) The Guns of August (A. Milyukov, Trans.). Moscow: AST (Russian translation).
25. Vollaro D.R. (2009) Lincoln, Stowe, and the “Little Woman/Great War” Story: The Making, and Breaking, of a Great American Anecdote. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 18–34.
Review
For citations:
Malinetskiy G.G. Humankind and the World at the Point of Bifurcation. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2025;68(1):92-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-1-92-115