Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Is Dialogue with a Technosubject Possible? Architectures of Artificial Intelligence and Signatures of Consciousness

Abstract

The article explores the phenomenon of consciousness through the lens of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and of contemporary neurobiological theories, each offering a distinct account of the architecture of conscious processing. This theoretical landscape allows us to identify several specific properties – such as a global workspace, recurrent processing, metacognitive monitoring, predictive processing, and high-level information integration – as functional signatures of cognitive processes inherent to biological consciousness. While certain AI systems exhibit some of these properties, they currently manifest in a fragmented and poorly integrated manner. The transition toward hybrid, particularly neurosymbolic, architectures, coupled with the expanding use of neuroevolutionary and embodied approaches in robotics, is laying the groundwork for integrated systems that more closely approximate conscious cognitive functions. However, the necessary conditions for a “genuine dialogue” between humans and a potentially conscious technosubject – including elements of intersubjectivity, empathy, mutual ethical responsibility, and lived bodily and social experience, or at least functional analogues thereof – suggest that the capacity for such interaction transcends the mere simulation of functional properties. The potential emergence of artificial general intelligence (AGI) in the near future, an entity capable not only of performing all human cognitive functions but also of demonstrating autonomous behavior and engaging in genuine dialogue, necessitates a proactive discussion of the technosubject’s normative status (the bounds of agency and responsibility, rights, duties, and safeguards for humans), along with the development of appropriate ethical principles and regulatory mechanisms.

About the Author

Arseniy V. Nedyak
Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence Research
Russian Federation

Arseniy V. Nedyak – Head of the Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence Research, 3rd class Active State Сounselor of the Russian Federation.

Moscow



References

1. Akhiezer A.S. (2008) Russia: A Critique of Historical Experience (3rd ed.). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

2. Anderson J.R. & Lebiere C.J. (1998) The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

3. Bakhtin M.M. (2003) Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works in 7 Vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 69–264). Moscow: Russkoe slovo (in Russian).

4. Buber M. (2024) I and Thou. Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

5. Butlin P., Long R., Elmoznino E., Bengio Y., Birch J., Constant A., …, & Kanai R. (2023) Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2308.08708.

6. Chalmers D.J. (2008) The Character of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Davydov A.P. (2020) The “Middle” as a Methodological Tool for Studying Social Reality. In: Gorshkov M.K. (Ed.) Reforming Russia: Yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 529–564). Moscow: Novyy khronograf (in Russian).

8. Davydov A.P. (2024) Mediation and Convergent Sociality: Toward a Theory of Social Dialogue. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 135–159 (in Russian).

9. Dennett D.C. (1991) Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

10. Dong Y.R., Martin L.J., & Callison-Burch C. (2023) CoRRPUS: Code-based Structured Prompting for Neurosymbolic Story Understanding. In: Rogers A., Boyd-Graber J., & Okazaki N. (Eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 (pp. 13152–13168). Kerrville, TX: Association for Computational Linguistics.

11. Evans R. & Grefenstette E. (208) Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. Vol. 61, pp. 1–64.

12. Floridi L. & Sanders J.W. (2004) On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 349–379.

13. Harnad S. (1990) The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. Vol. 42, no. 1–3, pp. 335–346.

14. Kosinski M. (2024) Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 121, no. 45, article e2405460121.

15. Le Cun Y., Bengio Y., & Hinton G. (2015) Deep Learning. Nature. Vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444.

16. Levinas E. (2000) Selected Works. Totality and Infinity (I.S. Vdovina & B.V. Dubin, Trans.). Moscow: Kul’tur. initsiativa; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (Russian translation).

17. Manhaeve R., Dumancic S., Kimmig A., Demeester T., & De Raedt L. (2018) DeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 31, pp. 3749–3759.

18. Maturana H. & Varela F. (2019) The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding (Yu.A. Danilov, Trans.). Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).

19. Oliveira N., Li J., Khalvati K., Barragan R.C., Reinecke K., Meltzoff A.N., & Rao R.P. (2023) Culturally-Attuned Moral Machines: Implicit Learning of Human Value Systems by AI through Inverse Reinforcement Learning. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2312.17479.

20. Putnam H. (1999) The Philosophy of Mind (L.B. Makeeva & O.A. Nazarova, Trans.). Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi (Russian translation).

21. Riegel R., Gray A., Luus F., Khan N., Makondo N., Akhalwaya I.Y., …, & Srivastava S. (2020) Logical Neural Networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2006.13155.

22. Rocktäschel T. & Riedel S. (2017) End-to-End Differentiable Proving. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 1–13).

23. Storm J.F. Klink P.C., Aru J., Senn W., Goebel R., Pigorini A., …, & Larkum M.E. (2024) An Integrative, Multiscale View on Consciousness Theories. Neuron. Vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 1531–1552.

24. Sun R. (2003) Duality of the Mind: A Bottom-Up Approach Toward Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

25. Wooldridge M. (2021) A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: What It Is, Where We Are, and Where We Are Going. New York: Flatiron Books.

26. Xu Z., Wu K., Wen J., Li J., Liu N., Che Z., & Tang J. (2024) A Survey on Robotics with Foundation Models: Toward Embodied AI. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2402.02385.

27. Yang S., Li X., Cui L., Bing L., & Lam W. (2025) Neuro-Symbolic Integration Brings Causal and Reliable Reasoning Proofs. In: Chiruzzo L., Ritter A., & Wang L. (Eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025 (pp. 5732–5744). Kerrville, TX: Association for Computational Linguistics.

28. Yao X. (1993) Evolutionary Artificial Neural Networks. International Journal of Neural Systems. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 203–222.

29. Yin X., Wang X., Pan L., Lin L., Wan X., & Wang W.Y. (2024) Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2410.04444.


Review

For citations:


Nedyak A.V. Is Dialogue with a Technosubject Possible? Architectures of Artificial Intelligence and Signatures of Consciousness. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2025;68(3):93-113. (In Russ.)



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)