On the Concepts of Mental Causation and Informational Causation
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-5-130-142
EDN: RSOAKL
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of mental causation – the question of how phenomena of subjective reality, which lack physical characteristics, can determine bodily processes. The author examines the distinctive features of the informational approach to the mind–brain problem and traces the development of his informational theory of consciousness from its origins in the 1960s, while also engaging with methodological objections raised against it from within analytic philosophy. A fundamental distinction is drawn between informational and physical causation: unlike the latter, the effect in informational causation is determined not by the physical properties of the substrate, but by an established code dependence that remains invariant with respect to those properties. Mental causation is understood as a specific form of informational causation, realized through neurodynamic code transformations in the brain. The author also explores the relationship between the mental and the physical, the problem of subjective reality, the category of the ideal, the principle of isofunctionalism of systems, and its epistemological implications. The article demonstrates the significance of the informational approach for contemporary neuroscience, particularly for decoding the neurodynamic brain codes of subjective reality phenomena. The author critically examines the interpretation of his theory offered by A.A. Zhudina and refutes her claims regarding the reduction of the mental to the physical, the identity of the mental and the physical, the causal closure of the physical domain, and the principle of supervenience. The study concludes that without a solid theoretical account of mental causation, neither a coherent theory of consciousness nor a scientifically rigorous explanation of free will is achievable.
About the Author
David I. DubrovskyRussian Federation
David I. Dubrovsky – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Chief Research Fellow, Department of Theory of Knowledge, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow
References
1. Chalmers D.J. (1995) Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 200–219.
2. Chalmers D.J. (2013) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (V.V. Vasilyev, Trans.). Moscow: URSS (Russian translation).
3. Davidson D. (1970) Mental Events. In: Foster L. & Swanson J.W. (Eds.) Experience and Theory (pp. 79–101). London: Duckworth.
4. Dennett D. (2004) Consciousness Explained (A.A. Veretennikov, Trans.). Moscow: Ideya-Press (Russian translation).
5. Dubrovsky D.I. (1962) On the Analytic-Synthetic Character of the Reflective Activity of the Brain (Ph.D. Thesis). Kiev (in Russian).
6. Dubrovsky D.I. (1968) Philosophical Analysis of the Psychophysiological Problem (D.Sc. Thesis). Rostov-on-Don (in Russian).
7. Dubrovsky D.I. (1971) Mental Phenomena and the Brain: A Philosophical Analysis of the Problem in Connection with Some Current Tasks of Neurophysiology, Psychology, and Cybernetics. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
8. Dubrovsky D.I. (1980) Information, Consciousness, Brain. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola (in Russian).
9. Dubrovsky D.I. (1983) The Problem of the Ideal. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
10. Dubrovsky D.I. (2002) The Problem of the Ideal: Subjective Reality (2nd ed.). Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).
11. Dubrovsky D.I. (2007) Why Subjective Reality, or “Why Do Not Information Processes Go in the Dark?”. A Reply to D. Chalmers. Voprosy filosofii. No. 3, pp. 90–104 (in Russian).
12. Dubrovsky D.I. (2019a) “The Hard Problem of Consciousness”. Theoretical Solution of Its Main Questions. AIMS Neuroscience. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–103.
13. Dubrovsky D.I. (2019b) The Problem of Consciousness: Theory and Critique of Alternative Concepts. Moscow: LENAND (in Russian).
14. Dubrovsky D.I. (2021) Information, Consciousness, Brain: Deciphering the Brain Codes of Mental Phenomena (2nd ed.). Moscow: LENAND (in Russian).
15. Dubrovsky D.I. (2023) The Problem of the Ideal (3rd ed.). Moscow: LENAND (in Russian).
16. Dubrovsky D.I. (2024) Mind and Brain: Experience in Developing Fundamental Theoretical Issues of the Hard Problem of Consciousness and Its Significance for Neuroscience. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 142–158 (in Russian).
17. Fodor J. (1974) Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis). Synthese. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 97–115.
18. Jackson F. (1982) Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 32, no. 127, pp. 127–136.
19. Nagel T. (1974) What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review. Vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 435–450.
20. Putnam H. (1967) Psychological Predicates. In: Capitan W.H. & Merrill D.D. (Eds.) Art, Mind, and Religion (pp. 37–48). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Searle J. (2002) The Rediscovery of the Mind (A.F. Gryaznov, Trans.). Moscow: Ideya-Press (Russian translation).
22. Vasilyev V.V. (2009) The Hard Problem of Consciousness. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya (in Russian).
23. Zhudina A.A. (2025) Mental Causation as Information Causation in D.I. Dubrovsky’s Theory of Consciousness. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 143–159 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Dubrovsky D.I. On the Concepts of Mental Causation and Informational Causation. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2025;68(5):130-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-5-130-142. EDN: RSOAKL
































