The article is devoted to the problem of division into periods in the history of philosophy. The author examines the concept “German idealism” and, on the basis of text analysis, concludes that this historico-philosophical construction is a little bit unsteady. Approximately before 1800 between Kant and his followers appears an ideological abyss because Schelling and after him Fichte are breaking off with criticism and beginning to create their own philosophico-theological systems. The author proposes to distinguish instead of German idealism two different, simultaneous developing philosophical trends. The first, - criticism, - comprises philosophies of Kant, early Fichte and Schelling, Fries and so-called “half-kantianism”. The second, - speculative idealism, - comprises Schelling’s philosophy of nature, late Fichte’s doctrine, Hegel, Krause and post-Hegelian speculative theism. The main idea of speculative idealism is the doctrine of divine self-consciousness/self-cognition.

The article is devoted to the understanding of the Democritus’s doctrine about atoms by Aristotle. The author assumes that the contradictions faced by Aristotle commenting atomism, are related to the perception of this monistic doctrine.

In the basis of human interaction with the outside world, there are such specific forms of reacting to the external impacts as feelings. These emotional states always played (and still do) the important role in organizing of collective behavior. But feeling is connected with direct response to the situation occurring in the certain time interval, therefore feeling cannot provide success of human action in the context of ‘probable future’. Growing complication of life of society demanded the invention of means that can provide feelings about imaginary situations. It determined the development of rational thinking that gradually replaced the emotional reactions of people to the direct impact of the outside world. The uprising of scientific cognition seemed to determine final domination of logical reasoning in intellectual sphere. However, some tendencies in the modern culture indicate that role of feelings in the life of common people is growing.

The article is devoted to the justification of coincidence of the consciousness of time and rationality at the level of principles of their organization. Temporality modus of rational procedures, categorial synthesis, logical operations is detected. Conceptual logical thinking is described in the form of temporary acts, experiences, representations. The analysis is performed in the basis of ideas of I. Kant, E. Husserl, phenomenology, transcendental philosophy, formal and modal logic and data of experimental psychology and physiology.

The article analyzes the problem of unity/multitude in contemporary ontological constructions. The main content of this work is devoted to the scrutiny of modes of unity transformation in the so-called unstable ontologies, based on the conceptions of the representatives of the ontology of abundance (G. Deleuze, A. Negri, P. Virno).

The theme of article is the teaching of philosophical disciplines at the St. Sergius Orthodox Theological Institute in Paris from 1925 - 1950. The author analyzes the philosophical ideas of V.V. Zenkovsky and V.N. Ilyin. In addition, the author explores the connection between the historic-philosophical ideas and Theology.

The article substantiates the claim that Trinitarian theology archpriest Sergei Bulgakov is a topic, within which the development of most of the problems are central to the work of the Russian thinker. Developing this theme, Bulgakov demonstrates the capabilities of productive dialogue of philosophy and theology, the history of these disciplines and their current status, outlines heuristic prospects as a philosophical and theological knowledge.

In this article social memory is regarded as one of universal mechanisms of human life. Under consideration: forms of memory, information as memory. There is a critical survey of D. Robertson's conception of types of social revolutions in information. A great deal of attention is given to non-verbal aspects of communication, their role in social memory and the forming of the social 'I' (me). There is also a question of contemporary qualitative redesigning of social memory when social memory is turning to the history of humankind and crosses with individual factors.

In the modern world, losing the information war can damage stronger than actual war. This is because the international institutions keep any transactions of the international law. So the direct investments exceeds the defense budget dramatically. Recently, the major technological framework of information war is the visualization because the latter is the leader in the affecting the emotional perception. The usage of the memorials and the cultural traditions in the information war is the subject of current work.

The article examines the role of historical memory for the consolidation of society, as a matter of symbolic politics. The author formulates the conditions under which the phenomena of social life are the objects for the symbolic politics. There is a systematization of communication technologies and tools for symbolic politics. The special case is a genocide in historical memory and information wars.

Crisis handling technologies in the 21st century forces us to analyze its evolutionary development, the nature and types, to offer foresight of human relations in the field of public relations. The transition to a qualitatively new level of relations between participants of the communication process is necessary.

The article examines the evolution of ideas in the sociology of life, which is based on the philosophy of life, developed by phenomenology, adherents of the mundanity theory and then by advocates of various sociological theories. Based on a number of interpretations of social processes, the sociology of life includes the interpretation of the main components, which in this or that proportion, in this or that aspect are present in every sociological study: social (group, individual) conscience, behavior (activity) and the surrounding macro-, meso- and microenvironment. The continuous unity of consciousness, behavior, and environment explored on the empirical level forms the «lifeworld». This concept opens perspectives for acquisition of new knowledge in fundamental and applied research of social problems.