Higher Education in Russia: Unrealizable Hopes?

The paper addresses the issue of the potential for Russian higher education to become the core of an innovation-driven economy, an institution for the production of knowledge and its integration into society. In addition to the mission of learning, an indicator of this potential for Russian universities is the level of implementation of research and socio-economic development missions. The genesis of the second and third missions of universities is used as a theoretical basis in this study. The author gives prominence to four historical stages that characterize the University 2.0 development (learning and research) in the formation of a research model of cognitive attitudes. In the context of a comparative analysis of higher education development in Russia and Europe, the article examines the emergence of University 3.0 – the key institution of a knowledge society that fulfills three academic missions (learning, research, socio-economic development). The author proposes the NCI&E-model of University 3.0, which includes the basic models of Network University, Creative University, Innovative, and Entrepreneurial University, and provides a brief description and interrelations of these models. This work discusses issues associated with the failure of the Russian “5–100” project in terms of listing its participants in the top 100 of global university rankings such as THE, QS, and ARWU. The authenticity of the formation of the entry list for the “5–100” project is called into question. A comparative analysis of Russian and foreign universities concerning the implementation of the third mission is provided, including the use of the index of University 3.0 development prerequisites proposed by the author. The author concludes that Russian higher education has low potential for the development of University 2.0 at the global level and for the creation of University 3.0. The author offers recommendations for addressing the problem of Russian higher education modernization, considering the development of its scientific and theoretical base and forming a strategic complex of development programs.

1. Auzan A.A. (2013). The Mission of the University: An Economist’s Perspective. Voprosy obrazovaniya. No. 3, pp. 266–286 (in Russian).

2. Berestov A.V., Guseva A.I., Kalashnik V.M., Kaminskiy V.I., Kireev S.V., & Sadchikov S.M. (2020) The Philosophy of the Knowledge Triangle: University, Industry, and Government. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. No. 2, pp. 9–26 (in Russian).

3. Bikkulov A.S. et al. (2016) Monitoring the Effectiveness of Innovation Activities of Russian Universities. Saint Petersburg: ITMO University; RVK (in Russian).

4. Bråten S. (1981) Modeller av menneske og samfunn: Bro mellom teori og erfaring fra sosiologi og. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget (in Norwegian).

5. Carayannis E.G., & Campbell D.F.J. (2011) Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 327–372.

6. Castells M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

7. Chernova T. (2013) Stillborn? The New Education Law Will Be Attempted to Reform. Poisk. No. 35 (1265), p. 5 (in Russian)

8. Department for Innovation, Universities & Skills (2008) Innovation Nation. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/238751/7345.pdf

9. Dijk J. van (2006) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. London: Sage.

10. Endovitsky D.A., Korotkikh V.V., & Voronova M.V. (2020) Competitiveness of Russian Universities in the Global Higher Education System: Quantitative Analysis. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. No. 2, pp. 9–26 (in Russian).

11. Etzkowitz H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University – Industry – Government. Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge.

12. Etzkowitz H. & Leydesdorff L. (2000) The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University – Industry – Government Relations. Research Policy. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123.

13. Gokhberg L.M. et al. (2022) Education in Numbers: 2022: Brief Statistical Compendium. Moscow: HSE University (in Russian).

14. Humboldt W. von (2010) On the Inner and Outer Organization of the Higher Scientific Institutions in Berlin. In Gründungstexte (pp. 229–241). Berlin: Der Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (in German).

15. Ignatov A.A. (2012) The Role of the Bayh-Dole Act (1980) in the Transfer of Scientific Knowledge and Technologies from American Universities to the Corporate Sector: Results of a Thirty-Year Journey. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 159–188 (in Russian).

16. Jaspers K. (1959) The Idea of the University. Boston: Beacon Press.

17. Kant I. (1979) The Conflict of the Faculties. New York: Abaris Books.

18. Karpov A.O. (2015). Key Theoretical Concepts of the Knowledge Society. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 9, pp. 812–820 (in Russian).

19. Karpov A.O. (2017а) The Modern University as a Driver of Economic Growth: Models and Missions. Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 3, pp. 58‒76 (in Russian).

20. Karpov A.O. (2017b) University 3.0 – Social Missions and Reality. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 9, pp. 114‒124 (in Russian).

21. Karpov A.O. (2018a) Universities in Knowledge Society: Theory of Creative Spaces. Voprosy filosofii. No. 1, pp. 17‒29 (in Russian).

22. Karpov A.O. (2018b) Potentialities for the University 3.0 in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 9, pp. 59‒70. (In Russian).

23. Karpov A.O. (2019) Education in Relation to Truth. Voprosy filosofii. No. 1, pp. 56‒66 (in Russian)

24. Klyucharev G.A. & Neverov A.V. (2018) Project “5–100”: Some Intermediate Results. Vestnik RUDN. Series: Sociology. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 100–116 (in Russian).

25. Magna Charta Universitatum (1988) Retrieved from https://www.magna-charta.org/magna-charta-universitatum/mcu-1988

26. Roberts E.B., Murray F., & Kim J.D. (2015) Entrepreneurship and Innovation at MIT: Continuing Global Growth and Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

27. Platova I. & Zhabenko I. (Eds.) (2016) Time Hurries: The City on the Neva Develops University 4.0. What is its Difference from Other Universities? Poisk. No. 30–31 (1416–1417), pp. 8–9 (in Russian).

28. Salmi D. & Frumin I.D. (2013) How States Achieve International Competitiveness of Universities: Lessons for Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya. No. 1, pp. 25–68 (in Russian).

29. Simons M. (2006) Education Through Research at European Universities: Notes on the Orientation of Academic Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 31–50.

30. Wellman B. (1979) Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1201–1231.

31. Wissema J.G. (2009) Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.