The “Tenderness” of the Principle of Least Action: From the Philosophy of Physics to the Paradigm for Sustainable Development
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-3-122-159
Abstract
The paper delves into the methodological aspects of how foundational mathematical and physical tenets, most notably the principle of least action, are interpreted and assimilated within humanities discourse. The pursuit of the article’s objectives is driven by the necessity for a philosophical and methodological analysis of the current conceptual status of the principle of least action. This analysis is informed by cognitive-axiological and teleological imperatives of a “synthetic” development program for the principle. Any fundamental principle will not have a definitive explanation, as otherwise it would not be fundamental, but in this case, some justification can be given based on deeper grounds discussed in the article. Drawing on the epistemological frameworks of French philosophers P. Hadot, E. Levinas, J. Bouveresse, and J.-T. Desanti, the article weaves together mathematical abstractions with human experience and philosophical doctrines with physical theories. J.-T. Desanti’s perspective on mathematical objects as an outcome of human activity is examined. Also scrutinized is B. Nicolescu’s concept of transdisciplinarity, which challenges the traditional subject-object dualism in science. The author’s methodological stance emerges from a dialectical viewpoint, one that eschews a simplistic dichotomy between materialism and idealism and is grounded in rigorous scientific inquiry and an exhaustive examination of the subject matter itself. The principle of least action, as a paramount principle in physics, is shown to exemplify a legacy of innovation, positioning it as both methodologically insightful and heuristically valuable. The paper also highlights how this principle diverges from the classical principle of economy. The broader goal – within the context of “sustainable development,” transdisciplinary studies, and creative industries – is to establish the principle of least action as a paradigmatic imperative for interaction within social and economic systems. The conclusions drawn from this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the principle’s essence, the nature of transdisciplinarity, and confront the vestiges of scientism in the humanities.
About the Author
Maryia J. MatsevichBelarus
Maryia J. Matsevich − Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management of Innovative Projects in Industry of the Belarusian National Technical University.
Minsk
References
1. Antenat N. (2000) Entretien avec Jean-Toussaint Desanti. Le Portique. Revue de philosophie et de sciences humaines. No. 5. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/leportique/412 (in French).
2. Aron R (1961). L’histoire et ses interprétations. Entretiens autour de Arnold Toynbee. Paris: Mouton & Co (in French).
3. Bouveresse J. (2001) Essais II. L’époque, la mode, la morale, la satire. Marseille: Agone (in French)
4. Bouveresse J. (2009, 15 Jan.) Se débarrasser du signifié: un entretien avec Jacques Bouveresse. Propos réunis par Knox Peden. In: The “Cahiers pour l’Analyse” and Contemporary French Thought. Retrieved from http://cahiers.kingston.ac.uk/interviews/bouveresse.html (in French).
5. Bouveresse J. (2015) Une épistémologie réaliste est-elle possible? Réflexions sur le réalisme structurel de Poincaré. Paris: Collège de France (in French).
6. Bouveresse J. (2016) Nietzsche contre Foucault. Sur la vérité, la connaissance et le pouvoir. Paris: Banc d’essais, Agone (in French).
7. Desanti J.T. (1968) Les idéalités mathématiques. Paris: Seuil (in French).
8. Desanti J.T. (1975) La philosophie silencieuse ou critique des philosophies de la science. Paris: Seuil (in French).
9. Grange J. (2010) La philosophie des sciences «à la française». In: Bachta A. (Ed.) Épistémologie et philosophie des sciences. En l’honneur d’Angèle Kremer-Marietti (pp. 61−70). Paris: L’Harmattan (in French).
10. Fermat P. (1959) The Synthesis of Refractions. In: Polak L.C. (Ed.) Variational Principles of Mechanics (pp. 5–10). Moscow: Fizmatgiz (Russian translation).
11. Hadot P. (1983) Physique et poésie dans le «Timée» de Platon. Revue de théologie et de Philosophie. Vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 113−133 (in French).
12. Hadot P. (1997) What is the Ancient Philosophy? (V.P. Gaydamak, Trans.). Moscow: Izatel’stvo gumanitarnoy literatury (Russian translation).
13. Hadot P. (2005a) Spiritual Exercises and Ancient Philosophy (V.A. Vorobyova, Trans.). Moscow: Stepnoy veter; Saint Petersburg: Kolo (Russian translation).
14. Hadot P. (2005b) Philosophy as a Way to Live: Conversations with Jeannie Carlier and Arnold I. Davidson. (V.A. Vorobyova, Trans.). Moscow: Stepnoy veter; Saint Petersburg: Kolo (Russian translation).
15. Hanc J., Hancova M., & Tuleja S. (2004). Symmetries and Conservation Laws: Consequences of Noether’s Theorem. American Journal of Physics. Vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 428–435.
16. Hegel G.W.F. (1997) The Science of Logic (B.G. Stolpner, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Nauka (Russian translation).
17. Heidegger M. (1993) The Question Concerning Technology (V.V. Bibikhin, Trans.). In: Heidegger M. Time and Being: Articles and Speeches (pp. 221−238). Moscow: Respublika (Russian translation).
18. Horkheimer M. & Adorno T.W. (1997) Dialectics of the Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (M. Kuznetsov, Trans.). Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Medium; Yuventa (Russian translation).
19. Leibniz G.W. (1983) New Essays on Human Understanding of the Author of the System of Pre-Established Harmony (P.S. Yushkevich, Trans.). In: Leibniz G.W. Works in 4 Vols. (Vol. 2, pp. 47−547). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).
20. Leibniz G.W. (1989) Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil. (K. Istomin, Trans.). In: Leibniz G.W. Works in 4 Vols. (Vol. 4, pp. 49−554). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).
21. Levinas E. (1999) Time and the Other (A.V. Paribka, Trans.). In: Levinas E. Selected Works: Time and the Other. Humanism of the Other Person (pp. 23−103). Saint Petersburg: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola (Russian translation).
22. Levinas E. (2000a) From Being to the Other (B.V. Dubin, Trans.). In: Levinas E. Selected Works. Totality and Infinity (pp. 350−355). Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (Russian translation).
23. Levinas E. (2000b) From Existence to the Existing (N.B. Mankovskaya, Trans.). In: Levinas E. Selected Works. Totality and Infinity (pp. 7−65). Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (Russian translation).
24. Levinas E. (2000c) Totality and Infinity (I.S. Vdovina, Trans.). In: Levinas E. Selected Works. Totality and Infinity (pp. 66−291). Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (Russian translation).
25. Levinas E. (2004) Humanism of the Other Person (A.V. Paribka, Trans.). In: Levinas E. Selected Works: Difficult Freedom (pp. 591−662). Moscow: ROSSPEN (Russian translation).
26. Loison L. (2021) Les épistémologies discontinuistes de Thomas Kuhn et Gaston Bachelard. Une appréciation critique depuis les sciences de la vie. In: Coqui G. & Braverman Ch. (Eds.) La rupture. Cahiers Gaston Bachelard. Vol. 16 (pp. 91−109). Dijon: Université de Bourgogne, Faculté des Lettres (in French).
27. Maupertuis P. (1959) Derivation of the Laws of Motion and Equilibrium from a Metaphysical Principle. In: Polak L.C. (Ed.) Variational Principles of Mechanics (pp. 41–55). Moskow: Fizmatgiz (Russian translation).
28. Nicolescu В. (1999) O Manifesto da Transdisciplinaridade. São Paulo: Triom (Portuguese translation).
29. Nicolescu B. (2008) Transdisciplinarity Theory and Practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30. Salthe S.N. (2002) The Natural Philosophy of Entropy. SEED. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 29–41.
31. Shestov L. (1992) Kierkegaard and Existential Philosophy (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness). Moscow: Progress – Gnozis (in Russian).
32. Shestov L. (1993) Athens and Jerusalem. In: Shestov L. Works in 2 Vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 317–664). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
33. Shestov L. (1966) Sola fide. Only by faith. Paris: YMCA-Press (in Russian).
34. Shestov L. (2004) Apotheosis of Groundlessness. Moscow: AST (in Russian).
35. Shestov L. (2007a) Potestas clavium. The Power of the Keys. Moscow: AST (in Russian).
36. Shestov L. (2007b) Great Vigils. Moscow: AST (in Russian).
37. Shestov L. (2009) On the Scales of Job. Moscow: Eksmo (in Russian).
38. Simons M. (2017) The Many Encounters of Thomas Kuhn and French Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 61, pp. 41−50.
39. Sykalo A.I. (2017) Attributive Theory and Imperative Ethics of Self-Organization as a Tool of a Morphologist. In: Studenikina T.M., Melnikov I.A., & Gaiduk V.S. (Eds.) The Structure of the Human Body and Animals in Norm, Pathology, and Experiment (pp. 178−183). Minsk: BSMU (in Russian).
40. Terekhovich V.E. (2012) Active and targeted causes in the principle of least action It. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. Series: Philosophy. Vol. 2, no. 3. pp. 49−59 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Matsevich M.J. The “Tenderness” of the Principle of Least Action: From the Philosophy of Physics to the Paradigm for Sustainable Development. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2023;66(3):122-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-66-3-122-159